Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who can the right-wing talkers pick on now? [Hey Rush... they're 'talkin 'bout 'ya]
Scripps Howard News Service ^ | December 16, 2004 | By DALE McFEATTERS

Posted on 12/16/2004 5:02:52 AM PST by johnny7

WASHINGTON — Right-wing talk radio is badly in need of a new demon, or, more accurately, a new person to demonize.

I am an AM-radio addict — good show, bad show, it doesn't matter because you're going to be out of range in 45 minutes anyway — and this fall I had occasion to do lots of long-distance driving. Sadly, local AM-radio shows are disappearing. You can still find ample religion and country-and-western on AM, but that's a little too much sin and adultery for my tastes. That leaves your reliable right-wing hosts — Rush, Laura, G. Gordon, Michael and the gang.

In retrospect, the golden age of right-wing radio talk was the Clinton years. Something about Bill and Hillary tapped deep reservoirs of venom and outrage. And when calm and civility threatened to break out, the Clintons always seemed ready with a fresh scandal, even, as they exited the White House for the last time, thoughtfully issuing wholesale pardons to a colorful collection of rogues and scoundrels. Truly, demons walked the Earth in those days.

Alas for the vibrancy of the right-wing talkers, their man George W. Bush was elected president and their party, the Republicans, controlled Congress. They went through the motions, but the old flash and fire weren't there. I began to realize how dire the lack of demons was early in the Bush administration when, in response to political columns, I would get e-mails asking if I were aware of the threat to civilization posed by one Tom Daschle. The common phrasing of many of the e-mails was a tip-off to their origin in right-wing talk radio. Now I'm all in favor of people taking an interest in current events and public affairs, but, really, there's no reason a person with a reasonable life has to know the name of the minority leader of the U.S. Senate. This was going fairly deep into the bench in search of demons. Bill Clinton was still on the loose, but he was writing a book, mourning his dead dog, opening a library and having heart surgery, all stuff that's hard to attack. Hillary, of course, became the junior senator from New York. The talkers, and the right generally, pray that Hillary will run for president in 2008. But she'll run for re-election first in 2006 and, unless your pulse quickens to dairy price supports, mass transit funding and Upstate economic development, there's not much there by way of red meat. Four years is too far off; heck, in radio, six minutes is too far off.

Mercifully, the Democratic primaries came around again, and a fine collection of targets they made, and the best target of all, John Kerry, got nominated. The more he explained his positions, the more impenetrable they became, and he had a puzzling inability to hit back. You could say pretty much anything about him with impunity, and the talkers did. His wife, the charming and intelligent Teresa Heinz Kerry, somehow became a cross between Madame Defarge and the Dragon Lady. His running mate, John Edwards, was a little harder to work with since the talkers had to explain to their audiences who he was before they attacked him. Laura Ingraham called Edwards "pretty pony" and "show pony." And then on Nov. 3, it was all over. The two Johns and Teresa, all the demons, were gone. It was like the saloon brawl in a Western movie when the good guys look around and all the bad guys are out cold or gone; that sort of "Now what do we do?" moment.

The right-wing talkers have been flailing in a demon-free environment ever since. Not too long ago I heard Rush Limbaugh tell his audience, "Don't be fooled, my friends, by this Harry Reid." (Ital) Harry Reid? (endital) Of course his listeners weren't fooled; most of them probably had no idea who Harry Reid is.

Harry Reid is a Democratic senator from Nevada and next month he will become the new minority leader of the U.S. Senate. The demon situation is that desperate.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
“ ...there's no reason a person with a reasonable life has to know the name of the minority leader of the U.S. Senate.”

Yeah Dan... unfortunate comment Sen. Reid (D)NV made on Timmy Russert's show. Guess we're too smart for our own good.

'Whatta a-hole!

1 posted on 12/16/2004 5:02:52 AM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Just another vacuous MSM'r slithering vitriolically into obscurity.
2 posted on 12/16/2004 5:08:53 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7; tiamat; Dan from Michigan; MeekOneGOP
Now I'm all in favor of people taking an interest in current events and public affairs, but, really, there's no reason a person with a reasonable life has to know the name of the minority leader of the U.S. Senate.

Hey!

Is this jerkwad calling me some kind of loser...WITH NO LIFE??!!

(Stalks off thread. Picks up latest edition of "Journal of American Politics." Cross-references ACU rating of Peter Hoekstra from 104th session of Congress with ACU rating from 106th session.

3 posted on 12/16/2004 5:10:29 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Of course his listeners weren't fooled; most of them probably had no idea who Harry Reid is.

There's a presumption here that Rush's audience is as stupid as the author.

4 posted on 12/16/2004 5:11:30 AM PST by Mike Bates (If you've been very, very good, Santa may give you. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

What a crackpot. I'm sure this guy has clothes hanger scars on his head from birth. Where do they find these dunderheads?


5 posted on 12/16/2004 5:13:44 AM PST by Jaysun (I'm pleased to report that Arafat's condition remains stable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

So the people who voted for Bush are stupid, but they don't need to know who the minority leader is? Keep 'em in the dark, and they won't vote for what's best for them.


6 posted on 12/16/2004 5:14:05 AM PST by eyespysomething (Remember Christ our Savior was born on Christmas Day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
“ ...there's no reason a person with a reasonable life has to know the name of the minority leader of the U.S. Senate.”

Maybe they figure they can get away with more if we don't know their names. They should wear masks or nylon stockings over their heads or something.

7 posted on 12/16/2004 5:14:31 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
How does this explain Rush's soaring ratings during the 1989-1993 BUSH I years?

Even after Dukakis and before Kuwait and CLinton's candidacy, the man's audience grew at its fastest during this time. I believe that is also when he released one of his million selling books.

And to top it off, he wasn't all that fond of Bush the Elder on air.
8 posted on 12/16/2004 5:16:40 AM PST by sittnick (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

That cesspool, the United (League of) Nations is still available for the job of demon...


9 posted on 12/16/2004 5:21:24 AM PST by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Funny thing is: Rush first became popular during the Presidency of George Bush (41), pre-Clinton, pre-Kerry, etc.

In fact, if anything, Rush was at his funniest in those days, because he had no single democrat lightning rod. He did updates about "animal rights wackos," "feminazis" etc., everyday.

Therefore, I would think Rush would have enough material just from the various liberal advocacy groups that still exist.

And, of course, the Hildebeast


10 posted on 12/16/2004 5:22:02 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

The writer assume that right wing talk radio always needs a single person to go after. One can have a great talk radio program just reading the news and continually seeing where right wing principles apply. There is no fear of us running out of nut job left wingers to talk about.


11 posted on 12/16/2004 5:22:49 AM PST by foolscap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

This A-hole is just trying to get his column mentioned on Rush's show. There's nothing in his column that hasn't been said before, and it's certainly been addressed by Rush many times.


12 posted on 12/16/2004 5:26:15 AM PST by Iowamerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap

He should know this name, but I should not???? Elitist punk!


13 posted on 12/16/2004 5:29:20 AM PST by ChadsDad (If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Now I'm all in favor of people taking an interest in current events and public affairs, but, really, there's no reason a person with a reasonable life has to know the name of the minority leader of the U.S. Senate

Ya mean it's not Daschle anymore ?????????????
14 posted on 12/16/2004 5:29:53 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Radix; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; LaDivaLoca; Fawnn; Bethbg79; ...
John Kerry, got nominated........ His wife, the charming and intelligent Teresa Heinz Kerry

The charming and intelligent Teresa ---- What rock has this writer been under for the last few months? With her comments about Laura Bush never having a real job, the raisins and booze, etc., I'd have a hard time calling her intelligent. BOZO? Yes. Intelligent, no way.

15 posted on 12/16/2004 5:33:44 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Lose the embedded reporters in our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

The lovely Laura referred to the lightweight Edwards as"Silky Pony." If Dale listened, as he claims he did, he would have known that.


16 posted on 12/16/2004 5:33:59 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

They don't need demons. They have a full-time job clearing up the confusion spread by confused but nonetheless determined-to-explain characters like Dale McFeatters.


17 posted on 12/16/2004 5:37:44 AM PST by Savage Beast (This is the choice: confrontation or capitulation. Appeasement is capitulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Yeah, what kind of thing is that to say? O_o


18 posted on 12/16/2004 5:38:15 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Today, I expect it'll be you, Dale. At least you hope so, huh?
19 posted on 12/16/2004 5:41:17 AM PST by timpad (The Wizard Tim - Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade, Finder of Obscurata)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Rush became popular during Bush I because of a couple things:

A) Bush the first was seen as not carrying on the Reagan Revolution. No great communciator, a thousand points of light, out of touch, seen as an elitist among the rank and file grass roots folks. B) There was an unbelieveable rise in Populism, ergo the rise of Ross Perot. C) It was chic to be anti-government. D) The Dems controlled congress and manipulated Bush I. E) Rush was novel and a back bencher much like Newt on his rise to the 94 election and the Contract with America.

20 posted on 12/16/2004 5:42:38 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson