When Rush started talking about how women were most at risk, I laughed so hard I thought I was going to cry. Rush was absolutely perfect today!
1 posted on
12/15/2004 7:02:06 PM PST by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
And we've reached now the absurdity of the absurd when they, at a U.N. conference, a supposed series scientist and scholar says that women are more at risk from climate changeThis is hugh!
2 posted on
12/15/2004 7:06:41 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
To: wagglebee
"...the great Ted Danson, a well-known scientist..."I love Rush's ascerbic wit particularly when he uses it on know-it-alls.
3 posted on
12/15/2004 7:07:45 PM PST by
arasina
(So there.)
To: wagglebee
Does that mean Sports Illustrated can no longer hold its annual swimsuit models contest? After all, its been anecdotally established too much sun and heat harms women.
4 posted on
12/15/2004 7:08:24 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: wagglebee
The environmental movement plays on the sensibility of gullible young people. Later on, as they grow older they become full of conviction of the environmental lobby regardless how irrational.
To: wagglebee
The environment is never stable. We humans should be humble enough to know we can't control nature. And yet here we have enviro nuts asserting its no problem to stop global warming. Which I think by the way, is the least of the world's problems. The irony is more fossil fuel and pollution is created flying to distant cities for conferences to deal with a hypothetical problem and the money expended could be better used for other more important purposes. But you will never hear the Left owe up to its mistakes.
6 posted on
12/15/2004 7:19:41 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: wagglebee
7 posted on
12/15/2004 8:00:40 PM PST by
samtheman
To: wagglebee
I remember talk of CO2 causing global cooling in the 1970's when I was a kid. I remember seeing magazine articles about it where New York City was covered in ice showing the two buildings of the World Trade Center sticking up and out like two large, white popsicles. I was talking to my father about it and the same thing was going around in the 1940's where he remembers an article in Look or Colliers where again, it showed a New York City covered in ice with the Empire State Building in the center.
8 posted on
12/15/2004 8:03:56 PM PST by
Nowhere Man
(We have enough youth, how about a Fountain of Smart?)
To: wagglebee
I'm waiting for Rush to do an environmentalist-whacko take on the Pistons-Pacers fight!
I caught some of this today. I loved the bit about chop-suey, and how THEY want the windmills where YOU live.
My sons have grown up listening to Rush!
Nobody compares to El Rushbo when he is on.
To: wagglebee
Rush was on target and letting the wacko's know about it.
11 posted on
12/15/2004 8:18:11 PM PST by
solo gringo
(Liberal democrats are swamp leaches)
To: wagglebee
Now, they're not going it build these windmills where they live. They're going to build them in places where you live, but of course the doesn't know a windmill from anything. He'll go flying right into it and chop suey it is. We have A windmill farm in this part of the country. It's lovely, brightens up the landscape. But I fail to see how a bird could be hurt by them. The windmills have only 3 slow-turning blades. There are more dead birds on the highways (ooops, should I say that?)
We have lots of room for windmills here. But some enviromentalists objected to putting windmills in a "tall grass preserve." ? Excuse me? Tall grass doesn't grow that tall.
13 posted on
12/15/2004 8:37:29 PM PST by
eccentric
(aka baldwidow)
To: wagglebee
"A careful study of extinction rates so far, conservation measures underway and a climate environmental change shows that at least 1,200 species of birds will be gone by 2100 and that is a conservative estimate, said the team at Stanford. Even though 1.3% of bird species have gone extinct since 1500, the global number of individual birds is estimated to have experienced a 20% to 25% reduction during the same period, they wrote in their report published in the Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, and this can have severe consequences for people. Uh huh.
"..and then you add Psalm six to Ezekiel twenty eight, subract the days in Revelation twenty three and skip to verse four --and there it is folks in black and white: Jesus is coming tommorow at three o'clock! Spend that money 'cause tommorow we're aaaall goin' home! Can I get an Amen?!
"Er, excuse me, sir? There is no Revelation chapter twenty three."
"There you go! See?! That's okay, son--you're excused and God loves you. But he says "be not a doubter! But be a believer!!"(thunderous applause and the organ kicks in on que...)
16 posted on
12/15/2004 8:57:29 PM PST by
telder1
To: wagglebee; farmfriend; calcowgirl; Carry_Okie; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; forester; Issaquahking; ...
Yes!!! Here it is, reduced down to the lowest common denominator and most simplistic level, even a comedic level, so that even the dumbest of the dumb... Yes, even Liberal Dems can hook up with it!!! (that is, if they wanted to, of course)
17 posted on
12/15/2004 9:06:03 PM PST by
SierraWasp
(Ronald Reagan was an exceptional "celebrity!" Jesse Ventura & Arnold Schwarzenrenegger are NOT!!!)
To: wagglebee
Rush was definitely on par today. Very funny show.
To: wagglebee; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
19 posted on
12/15/2004 10:00:30 PM PST by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: wagglebee
The global warmers are starting to rev up the propaganda machine with so much hot air that we could warm a lot of cold homes this winter. One thing for sure, the research money that is being spent could have gone into a few more power plants or oil refineries.
To: wagglebee
22 posted on
12/15/2004 11:15:39 PM PST by
SweetCaroline
( I promise God & myself that I will let go of this addiction that is destroying me!)
To: wagglebee
Compare Rush Limbaugh's reasoned, logical and scientific analysis to the global warming snow job as presented by Art Bell. Art Bell has co-written such books as the Quickening and the Coming Global Superstorm. Bell's "sky is falling" paranoia is being repeated by late night host, George Noory who have both promoted the movie, The Day After Tomorrow. The errors, misinformation, and the hysterical and repetitive exaggerations in these works is par for the course for the poor scholarship shown by global warmers.
What is underlying in the arguments presented is raw Marxism. Look no further folks, Marxism is the political doctrine used to evoke class envy and struggle to push the agenda. While the useful fools, such as Bell and his ilk, use the platform of the global warming paranoia to make lots of money, they are doing the bidding of our enemies to dismantle that wondrous mechanism that enriches mankind: capitalism. Thank God for Rush Limbaugh. Art Bell and George Noory could not even hold a candle for Rush. BELL AND NOORY WOULD BETTER SPEND THEIR TIME IF THEY WENT DOWN TO THE SANTA MONICA PIER AND WAITED FOR THE MOTHERSHIP!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson