Skip to comments.
WA Gov. Race: Court rules against Gregoire (w/update on 561 or 573 or 595 ballots)
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^
| 15 December 2004
| Chris McGann
Posted on 12/15/2004 8:24:07 AM PST by Publius
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
12/15/2004 8:24:08 AM PST
by
Publius
To: Publius
I'm a Washington Resident, and I had an honest calendar malfunction. This malfunction caused me to miss voting on Nov 2.
596.
2
posted on
12/15/2004 8:26:49 AM PST
by
C210N
To: Publius
The funny thing is that they don't even do this under the cover of night anymore. They're blatant about theft now.
3
posted on
12/15/2004 8:28:19 AM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative)
To: writer33
It must be time for the best 5 out of 8 recounts.Just ask the whacky judge if this is true.
4
posted on
12/15/2004 8:31:28 AM PST
by
jocko12
To: Publius
"At this point it is impossible for us to determine whether they are colossally incompetent or completely corrupt." Sounds like an accurate description of the democRAT party to me.
5
posted on
12/15/2004 8:32:05 AM PST
by
The_Victor
(Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
To: jocko12
Yep. We must be fair and count as many times as it takes for Gregoire to win. So the best of sounds like the right course here.
6
posted on
12/15/2004 8:33:24 AM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative)
To: writer33
That bump from 88 to 106 was 18 new votes for Rossi. That is why King County needed to come up with 22 more votes. They know exactly how those ballots have been voted, and they will come up with the exact number needed to win this race.
Until last night, I was ready to believe in colossal incompetance. Now I believe it's fraud.
7
posted on
12/15/2004 8:35:58 AM PST
by
Publius
To: Publius
8
posted on
12/15/2004 8:36:45 AM PST
by
petconservative
(4 more years (ilovemybush))
To: Publius
Yep. It's definitely fraud.
9
posted on
12/15/2004 8:38:49 AM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative)
To: Libertina; Chad Fairbanks
Ping. And ping anybody else who needs to read this.
10
posted on
12/15/2004 8:43:10 AM PST
by
Publius
To: Publius
Hey. It's worked for IL and MI since 1960. Why should WA not also take advantage of this tactic?
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; CyberCowboy777
12
posted on
12/15/2004 8:48:44 AM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(Go Ahead. Mace just makes me even more excited.)
To: Publius
The political wag in my office says, "Washington State is bankrupt already. If Gregoire and the Democrats are smart, they'll let Rossi win and then blame the looming fiscal crisis on him and the Republicans."
13
posted on
12/15/2004 8:54:27 AM PST
by
Snardius
To: Publius
This article makes it crystal clear that different counties in Washington State will use different standards in reviewing the votes in this election. That was the PRECISE constitutional error that the US Supreme Court found that Florida officials were committing in the 2000 presidential election.
Washington Republicans need to take this week's decision of the Washington Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court and CRAM them down the throats of the Democrats who are trying to steal this election.
Congressman Billybob
Click for latest, "Should the Iraqi Election be Delayed?"
14
posted on
12/15/2004 9:18:26 AM PST
by
Congressman Billybob
(FELICITY FAHRQUAR TAPES ON JEOPARDY -- TODAY!)
To: Publius
Gregoire stands to whittle down Rossi's lead by approximately 80 votes if the new King County votes follow the countywide trendI guess that means they need to find another 120 or so more ballots on the floorboards of the trucks transporting the voting machines back to the warehouse.
15
posted on
12/15/2004 9:35:04 AM PST
by
animoveritas
(Dispersit superbos mente cordis sui.)
To: Publius
So, if Gregoire wins, does anybody know Washington's recall provision? I know we have one, and I think it would be EASY to get it on the ballot. People are fuming about this, even people who voted for Gregoire.
To: Publius
Republican Secretary of State Sam Reed also did not agree with Vance's assertion about the votes in King County.Reed might as well just change parties now. He's finished!
17
posted on
12/15/2004 10:13:38 AM PST
by
No_Outcome_But_Victory
(Please pray for Ann, my pregnant wife. (High risk pregnancy.))
To: Congressman Billybob
Um the SCOTUS said Bush V Gore ONLY applied to that case. Otherwise it would have invalidated hundreds of other elections. That's why they took the unprecedented step of saying that it ONLY applied to the particular case and had no baring on past or future cases.
To: OneTimeLurker
SCOTUS may have tried to limit the application of
Bush v. Gore. And it certainly ran screaming into the night rather than decide the Torricelli case, that raised a similar issue in the NJ Senate race.
However, Court decisions are like a bell that once it has been rung cannot be unrung. Seven Justices signed on to the legal conclusion that Fla. violated the 14th Amendment. That is a legal club which the Washington Republicans can and should use against King County officials.
Congressman Billybob
Click for latest, "Should the Iraqi Election be Delayed?"
19
posted on
12/15/2004 11:20:38 AM PST
by
Congressman Billybob
(FELICITY FAHRQUAR TAPES ON JEOPARDY -- TODAY!)
To: No_Outcome_But_Victory
people in this state seem to think that Reed is on the up and up, but I won't vote for him ever again...
when we needed some moral outrage to counter balance this thievery of an election, he is siding with the thiefs....
20
posted on
12/15/2004 11:27:42 AM PST
by
cherry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson