Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WA Gov. Race: Court rules against Gregoire (w/update on 561 or 573 or 595 ballots)
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | 15 December 2004 | Chris McGann

Posted on 12/15/2004 8:24:07 AM PST by Publius

Counties won't be forced to reinspect invalid ballots; but saga's not over.

The state Supreme Court yesterday shot down Democratic gubernatorial candidate Christine Gregoire's best chance for a comeback, but the discovery of even more uncounted ballots in King County left Republicans livid.

The justices unanimously rejected a lawsuit that would have required counties to reinspect more than 3,000 previously disqualified absentee and provisional ballots.

Gregoire's hopes to prevail in a hand recount now rest largely on 573 King County absentee ballots that election officials say were wrongly disqualified because of a clerical error. Initially officials said there were 561 such ballots, but they revised that figure.

"Thank God King County found this mistake now instead of two weeks from now," Gregoire said.

Republicans, however, were fuming about the 573 new King County ballots. They were also upset late yesterday evening about a report from their observers at the King County recount facility that an additional 22 ballots had been discovered.

"This is the seventh time King County has made a mistake that has resulted in more votes," said state Republican Party Chairman Chris Vance. "At this point it is impossible for us to determine whether they are colossally incompetent or completely corrupt."

Vance vowed to fight.

"Those 22 ballots should absolutely not be counted," Vance said. "They have not been in a secure location. There is no postmark on them. We will absolutely contest those votes."

Bill Huennekens, King County's superintendent of elections, confirmed that 22 ballots were found and said they will be presented to the county canvassing board today.

He said that when he became aware of the 573 ballots, staff was instructed to review everything again. The 22 additional ballots -- 20 absentee and two provisional -- were found in base units of voting machines when crews picked them up from hundreds of precincts around the county.

Huennekens said he cannot say to what degree the ballots had been secured.

Earlier in the day, Republican Gov.-elect Dino Rossi commented on the 573 misfiled votes.

"It's just too much of a coincidence. They just keep coming up with votes, and it has never benefited me," Rossi said. "We're not going to take anything lying down, I'll guarantee you that."

He said he wants to make sure the new King County ballots are thoroughly investigated.

"We believe if you do a fair and honest recount, we win," Rossi said.

No matter who wins, the margin will be minuscule considering 2.8 million ballots were cast.

Rossi won the Nov. 2 election by 261 votes, then prevailed in a mandatory recount by 42 votes.

The state Democratic Party sued to force counties to reinspect disqualified votes the same day they commissioned a statewide hand recount. They hoped to bolster Gregoire's chances by adding hundreds, perhaps thousands, of new votes from King County, a Gregoire stronghold.

Losing in court is yet another blow for Gregoire and the Democrats. Rossi's lead has been expanding as the results from the manual recount trickle in. With all but seven counties reporting last night, his lead had increased to 106 votes.

Gregoire stands to whittle down Rossi's lead by approximately 80 votes if the new King County votes follow the countywide trend.

In rejecting the Democrats' lawsuit yesterday, the high court ruled that under Washington law, "ballots are to be 'retabulated' only if they have been previously counted or tallied."

Vance praised the Supreme Court's ruling but said the 573 mistakenly disqualified votes in King County should not be re-evaluated in light of the court decision.

"A recount is counting the votes again. That's all a recount is," Vance said.

Vance's interpretation relied on how the court defined a recount but ignored that the justices qualified that part of the ruling. State law also includes a provision that allows counties to fix errors, the justices wrote.

Vance was undeterred. "We are trying to apply the facts in King County to the decision that was rendered by the Supreme Court," he said.

King County Elections Director Dean Logan announced the mistake that led to the discovery of the 573 new ballots Monday.

Logan said the county canvassing board would decide today whether the ballots would be counted. He said it was likely that they would. "We take full responsibility," Logan said. "We need to correct the error."

State Elections Director Nick Handy said current law gives King County the discretion to review the 573 ballots in question.

"Matters that have already been decided by county canvassing boards should stand," Handy said.

But counties can review disqualified ballots in cases such as this one that involve an obvious inconsistency or irregularity.

"This would be the classic example of an irregularity," Handy said. "People were registered to vote and there was an administrative error. The county can go back and correct that."

Republican Secretary of State Sam Reed also did not agree with Vance's assertion about the votes in King County.

"Part of the argument that we made before the Supreme Court to get the decision was that it is not necessary to go back and totally recanvass to solve problems because the 'safety valve' is there for the county canvassing board to correct mistakes made by the counties," Reed said. "A county canvassing board can go back and correct mistakes that have been made by the county, for pretty obvious reasons."

King County Councilman Larry Phillips brought the problem in King County to Logan's attention Sunday, when he discovered his ballot had been ruled invalid.

Apparently election workers found no match when they checked signatures of Phillips and hundreds of other King County voters against an electronic database. But instead of setting the ballots aside to be checked against the actual paper registration forms, as they should have been, the ballots were simply filed as invalid.

"Ain't it great," Phillips said. "I'm fighting to get my vote counted."

Phillips said despite the mistake, Logan has administered the recounts well.

"I do not have any bone to pick with Dean," Phillips said. "Am I madder than hell that my vote didn't count? Yes, but I'm not going to throw the whole system out."

Reed was pleased with the Supreme Court's decision not to reinspect the 3,000 previously rejected ballots across the state.

"We are going to continue to be able to expedite this hand recount and get it over with, possibly by next week," he said.

"If the court had ruled for the Democratic Party, it would have established a terrible precedent. Because in the future, the candidates behind would request re-examination over and over again of any ballots that were rejected."

Randy Bowden, 49 of Kirkland, was on the list of roughly 1,500 absentee voters disqualified in King County because signatures didn't match voter registration cards. His wife said he was upset over the prospect that his vote might not count.

"He wants Rossi to win," Terri Bowden said.

Kirstin Brost, spokeswoman for the Washington state Democratic Party, said the high court's decision was disappointing.

"The court is not ... going to stop the counties from taking action," Brost said. "So the next step for us is to go work one-on-one with the county auditors and make sure every valid vote is counted."


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: christinegregoire; dinorossi; fraud; governor; gregoire; recount; rossi; waelections; wapolitics; washingtonstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2004 8:24:08 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius
I'm a Washington Resident, and I had an honest calendar malfunction. This malfunction caused me to miss voting on Nov 2.

596.

2 posted on 12/15/2004 8:26:49 AM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

The funny thing is that they don't even do this under the cover of night anymore. They're blatant about theft now.


3 posted on 12/15/2004 8:28:19 AM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: writer33

It must be time for the best 5 out of 8 recounts.Just ask the whacky judge if this is true.


4 posted on 12/15/2004 8:31:28 AM PST by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Publius
"At this point it is impossible for us to determine whether they are colossally incompetent or completely corrupt."

Sounds like an accurate description of the democRAT party to me.

5 posted on 12/15/2004 8:32:05 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocko12

Yep. We must be fair and count as many times as it takes for Gregoire to win. So the best of sounds like the right course here.


6 posted on 12/15/2004 8:33:24 AM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: writer33
That bump from 88 to 106 was 18 new votes for Rossi. That is why King County needed to come up with 22 more votes. They know exactly how those ballots have been voted, and they will come up with the exact number needed to win this race.

Until last night, I was ready to believe in colossal incompetance. Now I believe it's fraud.

7 posted on 12/15/2004 8:35:58 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Publius

stinkin cheaters


8 posted on 12/15/2004 8:36:45 AM PST by petconservative (4 more years (ilovemybush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Yep. It's definitely fraud.


9 posted on 12/15/2004 8:38:49 AM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; Chad Fairbanks

Ping. And ping anybody else who needs to read this.


10 posted on 12/15/2004 8:43:10 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Hey. It's worked for IL and MI since 1960. Why should WA not also take advantage of this tactic?


11 posted on 12/15/2004 8:46:42 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; CyberCowboy777

Ping!


12 posted on 12/15/2004 8:48:44 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (Go Ahead. Mace just makes me even more excited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

The political wag in my office says, "Washington State is bankrupt already. If Gregoire and the Democrats are smart, they'll let Rossi win and then blame the looming fiscal crisis on him and the Republicans."


13 posted on 12/15/2004 8:54:27 AM PST by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
This article makes it crystal clear that different counties in Washington State will use different standards in reviewing the votes in this election. That was the PRECISE constitutional error that the US Supreme Court found that Florida officials were committing in the 2000 presidential election.

Washington Republicans need to take this week's decision of the Washington Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court and CRAM them down the throats of the Democrats who are trying to steal this election.

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest, "Should the Iraqi Election be Delayed?"

14 posted on 12/15/2004 9:18:26 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (FELICITY FAHRQUAR TAPES ON JEOPARDY -- TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Gregoire stands to whittle down Rossi's lead by approximately 80 votes if the new King County votes follow the countywide trend

I guess that means they need to find another 120 or so more ballots on the floorboards of the trucks transporting the voting machines back to the warehouse.

15 posted on 12/15/2004 9:35:04 AM PST by animoveritas (Dispersit superbos mente cordis sui.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

So, if Gregoire wins, does anybody know Washington's recall provision? I know we have one, and I think it would be EASY to get it on the ballot. People are fuming about this, even people who voted for Gregoire.


16 posted on 12/15/2004 10:07:40 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Republican Secretary of State Sam Reed also did not agree with Vance's assertion about the votes in King County.

Reed might as well just change parties now. He's finished!

17 posted on 12/15/2004 10:13:38 AM PST by No_Outcome_But_Victory (Please pray for Ann, my pregnant wife. (High risk pregnancy.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Um the SCOTUS said Bush V Gore ONLY applied to that case. Otherwise it would have invalidated hundreds of other elections. That's why they took the unprecedented step of saying that it ONLY applied to the particular case and had no baring on past or future cases.


18 posted on 12/15/2004 10:32:53 AM PST by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeLurker
SCOTUS may have tried to limit the application of Bush v. Gore. And it certainly ran screaming into the night rather than decide the Torricelli case, that raised a similar issue in the NJ Senate race.

However, Court decisions are like a bell that once it has been rung cannot be unrung. Seven Justices signed on to the legal conclusion that Fla. violated the 14th Amendment. That is a legal club which the Washington Republicans can and should use against King County officials.

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest, "Should the Iraqi Election be Delayed?"

19 posted on 12/15/2004 11:20:38 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (FELICITY FAHRQUAR TAPES ON JEOPARDY -- TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: No_Outcome_But_Victory
people in this state seem to think that Reed is on the up and up, but I won't vote for him ever again...

when we needed some moral outrage to counter balance this thievery of an election, he is siding with the thiefs....

20 posted on 12/15/2004 11:27:42 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson