To: ZULU
Really? You think McCain would be worse than Hillary or is this a protest?
17 posted on
12/15/2004 8:09:06 AM PST by
KJacob
(I will not worry about 2008 until late 2007.)
To: KJacob
McCain can't afford to run. If he won, he wouldn't have face time on the newsie/Sunday talk programs. He's as vain as Bill Clinton when it comes to getting his face on TV.
Plus, he is too much of a loose cannon to be President.
[Actually, I hate to say it, but if Hillary won, she would strive to be a better-than-average President. She would want to distance herself from 1992-2000 and create her own legacy to overshadow the failed legacy of her other half.]
23 posted on
12/15/2004 8:15:03 AM PST by
TomGuy
(America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
To: KJacob
I think McCain is such a loose cannon and he is as dangerous as Hillery for other reasons.
At least if Hillery got elected, there would be hope for another "real" Republican to run against her in 2012. If McCain got nominated and elected, he would be bale to run for two terms.
McCain screwed up big time with McCain-Feingold. It really helps the Dems. He is against gun shows and gun show sales. He supports illegal invaders. He might be strong on defence, but I don't trust his judgement. I think he is a loose cannon more interested in his popularity with Dems and the liberal press than in fostering a Republican agenda.
His latest attacks agsint Rumsfeld were most inappropriate.
47 posted on
12/15/2004 8:41:30 AM PST by
ZULU
(Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson