Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reagankid
The difference here was, I didn't want to slap the people; I wanted to slap every General Motors shareholder.

Hint for Carpenter: General Motors shareholders are Americans too.

12 posted on 12/15/2004 8:04:02 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon; reagankid

Ironically enough, Roger Smith actually deserves a lot of criticism, but the film completely missed the mark.

Smith had to lay off those people to save the company. The company was bleeding money.

It was bleeding money largely because it was making crummy cars few in their right minds wanted to buy.

Smith was right in the middle of a movement that celebrated trying to control costs through automation at the expense of the quality and design of cars. What he wound up with was automation that didn't work, and cars that were too bland and poorly designed to sell. Thus, the layoffs.

Smith deserved criticism for his bad strategy, in other words, but not for the layoffs. Given the company's situation, they were necessary to keep it in business.

D


21 posted on 12/15/2004 9:11:52 AM PST by daviddennis (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson