"Count votes that count" FOR GREGOIRE

Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | 14 December 2004 | Seattle P-I Editorial Board

[JosefK]

Folks, I'm going to post my opine in a bit, but I thought you should see this.

Also, if readers have tips on election theft attempts or know of any suspicious activity UNreported by the media to change the result - please call Rossi HQ at 425.646.7202. They REALLY need to know...

[JosefK]

Consider yourself pinged...

[JosefK]

Consider yourselves pinged...

[jolie560]

Either people voted using the proper tools or they didn't. What's with these "do-over" votes?

[JosefK]

Who knows? I say: RUNOFF

[Congressman Billybob]

The third paragraph of this editorial is flat-out false. This is not a "recanvassing" of the votes. Furthermore, to apply a different standard in King County alone is a flat-out violation of "equal protection of the laws" as found in Bush v. Gore by the US Supreme Court in 2000.

The Democrats are trying, as in Florida, New Jersey, Hawaii, and elsewhere, to steal this election by deliberate violation of the laws, state or federal. It's as simple as that.

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest, "Should the Iraqi Election be Delayed?"

[JosefK]

The third paragraph of this editorial is flat-out false. This is not a "recanvassing" of the votes. Then what is it?

[connectthedots]

The ruling did not question, however, county elections boards' option of "recanvassing," or re-examining and counting ballots that may have been erroneously rejected before they could be counted.

This was addressed during oral arguments; I was there. The reason the ruling does not address the option of "recanvassing' is because there is no provision in the statutes for recanvassing. The statutes make mention of canvassing and recounting. The purpose for not allowing recanvassing is to prevent vote fraud.

None the less, i will be going to the Rossi HQ on Thursday with some very useful information regarding criminal conduct by Gregoire.

[JosefK]

Make sure you call 425.646.7202 first - I've heard they've moved...

If you've got the new address - go ahead and post that here. We need to know where it is...

[connectthedots]

They are in the same building, but different offices.

[Star Traveler]

You said -- "Either people voted using the proper tools or they didn't. What's with these "do-over" votes?"

It appears that there is a legitimate problem there. I only say that because of a TV news program (the NW Channel on cable) which highlighted an "official" (of the government or the election process) -- who -- when examining those ballots found his own ballot among those ballots.

Well now..., can you imagine!!?? To say the least, he was pissed!

It appears that the election board (or whatever it's called) did not have the original signatures "on file" (or rather "at hand") to examine those ballots, so they rejected them. HOWEVER they did have the signatures from when those people (or at least "some" of them) were originally signed up. This one guy who was featured on the news had a very legitimate complaint I would say.

It would just be very unfortunate if that big mistake by the election board would cause the Republican candidate to lose -- in the process of correcting their mistake (and it does definitely appear to be their mistake).

Regards,

Star Traveler

[Star Traveler]

You said -- "None the less, i will be going to the Rossi HQ on Thursday with some very useful information regarding criminal conduct by Gregoire."

What about that "kind" of vote, that I outlined (above) from the NW Cable Channel, regarding the election board, which rejected valid votes? Now, that's one thing I've got a question about.

It's one thing to reject bogus, bad and invalid votes (and I agree with that), but it's quite another to be rejecting perfectly valid ones. I say that, because then I might find (one day) my vote on the "rejecting end" of that process.

Regards,

Star Traveler

[Splatter]

I would like to know how many people predicted King county would "discover" additional uncounted ballots in the recount? I know I did.

And if I hear the "I'm on your side.. but prove election fraud" troll barking again, I will puke. No conscience or principles makes a good Democrat..

[Splatter]

Darn.. just puked on my loafers.

I think most honest people can accept legitimate results. Can anyone say that Gregoire will win this count (and don't kid yourself..she will win) and be a legitimate Governor?

[Splatter]

Is anyone else listening to John Fund on KPAM? The man knows what is going on in King county! Great grasp on the WA election manipulation. Great interview..

[Congressman Billybob]

As Washington State law plainly says, and its SC read its law that way in today's decision, "canvassing" means determining which votes are legally cast, so they can be counted. "Recount" means verifying the counts and math on the legal votes. It does NOT mean going over the invalid votes for a third time.

Billybob

[Splatter]

KING COUNTY "FOUND" 22 MORE BALLOTS! They are now padding their scam.

[Splatter]

Now "discovered" vote tally.. 577 + 22 = 599 "found" votes in King county!

[Splatter]

They "found" 22 more King county ballots in the bottom of a ballot box. Oh no! More disenfranchised liberals. Who is smoking what in King county? Either that or the fix is in. DISGUSTING!

[MissouriConservative]

bump for later read