Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jolie560
You said -- "Either people voted using the proper tools or they didn't. What's with these "do-over" votes?"

It appears that there is a legitimate problem there. I only say that because of a TV news program (the NW Channel on cable) which highlighted an "official" (of the government or the election process) -- who -- when examining those ballots found his own ballot among those ballots.

Well now..., can you imagine!!?? To say the least, he was pissed!

It appears that the election board (or whatever it's called) did not have the original signatures "on file" (or rather "at hand") to examine those ballots, so they rejected them. HOWEVER they did have the signatures from when those people (or at least "some" of them) were originally signed up. This one guy who was featured on the news had a very legitimate complaint I would say.

It would just be very unfortunate if that big mistake by the election board would cause the Republican candidate to lose -- in the process of correcting their mistake (and it does definitely appear to be their mistake).

Regards,

Star Traveler

11 posted on 12/14/2004 6:18:40 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

By the election board IN KING COUNTY.

I'm somehow disposed to treat this 'mistake' regarding the election official's ballot as p.r. showing that it was a 'mistake' for all 561.

The fix is in.


23 posted on 12/14/2004 7:30:29 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson