Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DRUDGE: SOURCES: NY GOV PATAKI WORKS BEHIND SCENES TO BE CONSIDERED HOMELAND SECURITY SEC
drudgereport ^ | DRUDGE

Posted on 12/13/2004 10:50:06 AM PST by crushelits

SOURCES: NY GOV PATAKI WORKS BEHIND SCENES TO BE CONSIDERED HOMELAND SECURITY SEC ... DEVELOPING...


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: Arizona; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: New Mexico; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: behindscenes; bordercontrol; borderpatrol; canisaypatakisucks; consideredhomeland; dhs; didisaypatakisucks; gov; ice; illegals; immigration; king; kinggeorge; ny; pataki; patakifeller; patakireallysucks; patakistinks; patakisucks; sec; security; sources; suckuptony; term2; uspresident4mexico; works
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: oceanview

IMHO, he's unelectable in NY...,ore tot he point..the state has HUGE fiscal problems..and it's getting worse..better to get out now..


21 posted on 12/13/2004 11:04:49 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her gene pool. Any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

Politics

Gov. Pataki is Unfit for the White House



by Deroy Murdock
Posted Dec 10, 2004
Human Events

NEW YORK -- With 2008 just four years away, it's not too early to rule New York governor George Elmer Pataki unfit for the GOP nomination. Republicans should study his record and keep him as far from their party's ticket as Albany is from Albuquerque.

After 10 years as governor, Pataki's legacy rests on three legs: an anemic economy, a listless state Republican party, and a deteriorating ethical climate.

The Pacific Research Institute recently measured economic freedom in all 50 states. While PRI ranked Kansas No. 1 overall, New York State was dead last at No. 50. It was rated 42nd on regulation, 47th on fiscal affairs, and 50th on government size, welfare spending, and income redistribution.

As this country's most economically repressed state, New York is America's North Korea with Pataki as its Kim Il-Sung. To be fair, Pataki neither starves his people nor stashes atomic weapons (as far as we know). He does possess, however, an annoyingly anti-Republican lust for big government that has hobbled the Empire State.

Hudson Institute president Herbert London notes that California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's $105.3 billion fiscal year 2005 budget spends $2,967 per capita on 35.5 million citizens. New York's $101.3 billion fiscal plan, in contrast, spends $5,276 per capita on 19.2 million people. Even worse, New York's 20th consecutive delayed budget was due April 1 but was adopted August 11. While state legislators are mainly to blame, the largely unassertive, often invisible Pataki neither can inspire nor dragoon lawmakers into adult behavior.

"It's difficult to imagine that Pataki has a future as a national leader after he's brought New York to its knees," London says. "Not everyone in America knows George Pataki, but those who know Pataki don't want him to do for America what he's done for New York."

While Albany faces a $6 billion budget deficit, Pataki himself stars in brand-new TV commercials in which he recruits Medicaid applicants. The ads are targeted not only at the destitute, but at small business owners and recent college graduates. Not surprisingly, Medicaid enrollment has rocketed 14.75 percent from 3.39 million beneficiaries in June 2002 to 3.89 million taxpayer-subsidized participants last month. In other words, 20.26 percent of New Yorkers are on Medicaid.

New Yorkers pay $141 in combined state and local taxes per $1,000 in income. America's highest tax burden is 26 percent above the national average. Local taxes alone are 71 percent above average. These Citizens Budget Commission figures are for fiscal year 2000 and do not reflect subsequent state and local tax hikes that have uglified this picture.

State and local taxes are both pertinent here, since they are so entwined.

"New York has the largest Medicaid program in the country," says Manhattan Institute senior fellow Steven Malanga. "It's the size of California's and Texas' Medicaid programs combined. Municipalities are forced to pay half the state's cost. No other state does this. In most places, local taxes fund education. In New York, local taxes pay for Medicaid and education. In some municipalities, Medicaid eats up more money than education, and there's nothing really like that anywhere else."

Even as he impoverishes New Yorkers, Pataki has let the Empire State GOP drift like an unanchored Hudson River barge. Top Republicans are not enjoying the ride.

The state GOP has "no overwhelming vision or course," Congressman Peter King (R - Long Island) complained to the New York Post.

"We're now headed in the direction of a party that doesn't stand for anything anymore," Congressman John Sweeney (R - Saratoga) told the Associated Press. "I think the governor has to do a reassessment of how he's been functioning as the leader of our party." Sweeney added: "We've lost our way, and the election returns show it."

This paucity of principle indeed has devastated Republican candidates. In 2002, GOP executives lost in Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester counties. Democrats now control the once-Republican Nassau and Westchester legislatures. Last November, Democrats boosted their minority State Senate caucus and expanded their State Assembly majority. As GOP activist George Marlin wrote in the November 7 New York Post: "The 35 powerless Republican legislators, known for their ability to stare into space, merely serve as decorations in the Assembly chamber."

To challenge Democratic U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, Pataki plucked from obscurity State Assemblyman Howard "I am not into labels" Mills. He quickly returned there after scoring just 24 percent to Schumer's 71 -- New York's severest Senate drubbing ever.

Placing Pataki at the national helm similarly would send the GOP barge right over Niagara Falls.

Finally, a sleazy breeze buffets Pataki as his allies keep landing in trouble.

Pataki's plan to expand Manhattan's Jacob Javits Convention Center typically features $350 million in fresh borrowing, a new 5 percent airport car rental tax, elimination of the standard lowest-bid requirement, plus language to prevent state comptroller's audits.

Former state senator Guy Velella earned one year in prison for taking bribes. The Local Conditional Release Commission, an obscure Gotham agency, suddenly and illegally freed the Bronx Republican boss September 28 after barely three months' incarceration. Three days earlier, the Pataki Administration gave a promotion and 10 percent raise to Eugenio Russi, brother of LCRC chairman Raul Russi. Coincidence? Pataki's cronies are under scrutiny.

Democratic state comptroller Alan Hevesi canceled a 2001 contract with Richard A. Hutchens to build at least $21.7 million in residences on state property beside the 524-mile-long Erie Canal. According to state attorney general Eliot Spitzer, New York State Canal Corporation staffers gave Hutchens inside information so he could secure a non-competitive bid for these lucrative development rights for just $30,000. Hutchens -- surprise, surprise -- has donated $8,000 to Pataki's political coffers. "Everybody makes a political contribution for a purpose," Hutchens told investigators.

Spitzer believes that Canal Corp. pursued Hutchens as a political sugar daddy. According to Spitzer's November 29 report, "at least one staff member also came to view [Hutchens] as a prospect to be mined for campaign contributions." Canal Corp. staffers nicknamed Hutchens "the golden goose."

As one of Pataki's constituents, it is enormously frustrating to hear his name mentioned alongside a truly promising White House prospect: "America's Mayor," Rudy Giuliani. There's nearly nothing GOP about George Elmer Pataki. The sooner Republicans across America fathom that, the safer the Grand Old Party will be in 2008.

Mr. Murdock, a New York-based commentator, is a columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a Senior Fellow with the Atlas Economic Research Foundation in Fairfax, Va.


22 posted on 12/13/2004 11:05:03 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
I can't believe the bench is this thin. It's not that Pataki would be that bad, it is just he would not be that good.

I vote for Jim Woolsey. He's a Democrat and it will p!$$ off the Clintons.

Let Pataki run for Hillary's seat. That's a threefer.

23 posted on 12/13/2004 11:08:13 AM PST by Gritty ("Short of recovery of spiritual and moral strength, Europe faces submission to Muhammad-S Trifkovic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Man's a complete doofus.


24 posted on 12/13/2004 11:09:46 AM PST by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
As one of Pataki's constituents, it is enormously frustrating to hear his name mentioned alongside a truly promising White House prospect: "America's Mayor," Rudy Giuliani. There's nearly nothing GOP about George Elmer Pataki.

And even less GOP about Guiliani.

I really thought this guy had credibility until I read that.

25 posted on 12/13/2004 11:14:26 AM PST by sandalwood ("Hail to alcohol - the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" - - HJ Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
Great. /sarcasm

Nominate Ollie North.

26 posted on 12/13/2004 11:16:12 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No!

Not Even For Dog Catcher!


27 posted on 12/13/2004 11:24:46 AM PST by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I agree with you regarding the governor's seat (although the Legislature and their relationship with the public schools is more to blame for the fiscal problems then Pataki), and he should get out now.


28 posted on 12/13/2004 11:27:22 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

and was that Qunnipiac or Marist or Zogby? they all tilt left.


29 posted on 12/13/2004 11:28:16 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
"...elimination of the standard lowest-bid requirement...

As long as there are sufficient safeguards to protect the building owner, etc., I have no problem with this. Thw lowest bidder is not always the best solution for the money. Currently, as long as you can get bonded, you can bid on state work. People do this and then roll up to the job-site with a ladder on top of their car roof. You can end up with a real problem with work that was completed in a sub-standard manner, and the contractor out of business.

30 posted on 12/13/2004 11:29:32 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rintense

we don't even have the political b*lls to fight off the wolves over a nanny tax issue, and yet I see all these people posting that Ollie North should be put up for DHS. are you people dreaming?


31 posted on 12/13/2004 11:30:03 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
WORKS BEHIND SCENES

What exactly does that mean ???

Hmmmmmm

And no .. he'd be terrible for the job too

32 posted on 12/13/2004 11:31:16 AM PST by Mo1 (Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Great. An anti-2nd amd RINO.


33 posted on 12/13/2004 11:31:48 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elbucko

What's Stormin' Norman doing these days?


34 posted on 12/13/2004 11:32:10 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Time to let slip the dogs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chris1

I think NYers posting about how bad Pataki is, have short memories about how bad things were under the Cuomo/Dinkins regimes.


35 posted on 12/13/2004 11:32:30 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
have short memories about how bad things were under the Cuomo/Dinkins regimes.

It won't be long before we're re-living those years under Spitzer et al......

36 posted on 12/13/2004 11:34:05 AM PST by b4its2late (It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: oceanview; johnny7

The state legislature is the most corrupt in the country, but Pataki could have fought the principled fight...instead, he caved..BTW..item in today's NY Posts says that Pataki is dumping his two long time political advisors..Arthur Finkelstein and Kieran Mahoney.


37 posted on 12/13/2004 11:37:16 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her gene pool. Any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All
Sen. Susan Collins, the Maine Republican who heads the Senate committee that will take up the nomination, said two "terrific choices" would be Asa Hutchinson (search), the department's undersecretary for border and transportation security, and Sen. Joe Lieberman (search), D-Conn.

"Joe Lieberman is a terrific person and has the faith and confidence in everyone in the Senate and at the White House, quite frankly," said former White House political director Ron Kaufman.

But Steve Murphy, who served as the campaign manager for former presidential hopeful Dick Gephardt (search), said there could be political repercussions to tapping Lieberman. Even though the senator is a Democrat, members of his party might balk because Connecticut has a Republican governor who would be responsible for picking a replacement should Lieberman leave the Senate.

"I think what matters here is the next homeland security secretary … there shouldn't be any partisanship whatsoever in the choice," Murphy added. "Democrats and Republicans have got to join together to do the job as best we can."

Among the other names that had been circulating for the post before Kerik's selection on Dec. 3 were Joe Allbaugh (search), former director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (search), and White House homeland security adviser Fran Townsend (search).

But it was still possible that the White House would break the search wide open again rather than return to the previous stable of top contenders, said a senior administration official. THIS FROM FOX NEWS story continues...

38 posted on 12/13/2004 11:37:27 AM PST by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Surprisingly, it took the liberals in NY longer to destroy the state (fiscally) than it took the liberals in California.


39 posted on 12/13/2004 11:38:19 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Time to let slip the dogs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fury
You can end up with a real problem with work that was completed in a sub-standard manner, and the contractor out of business.

Performance bonds

40 posted on 12/13/2004 11:39:43 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson