Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S.: Pakistan of little help in the hunt for bin Laden
Daily Breeze ^ | December 13, 2004 | James Risen and David Rohde

Posted on 12/13/2004 4:51:45 AM PST by Saberwielder

U.S.: Pakistan of little help in the hunt for bin Laden

By James Risen and David Rohde

THE NEW YORK TIMES

Hunting for Osama bin Laden, the CIA established a series of small, covert bases in the rugged mountain frontier of northwest Pakistan in late 2003. Bin Laden, the terrorist leader, was being sheltered there by local tribesmen and foreign militants, the agency had concluded, and he controlled a group of handpicked operatives dedicated to attacking the United States.

But since the bases opened, the CIA officers stationed there have been strictly supervised by Pakistani officials, who have limited their ability to operate and have escorted them wherever they travel in the Pakistani border region. As a result, it has been virtually impossible for the Americans to gather intelligence effectively, say several officials familiar with the operation who would speak only anonymously.

Search is stalled

More than three years after the Sept. 11 attacks on the Pentagon and New York transformed bin Laden into the most wanted man in the world, the search for him remains stalled, frustrated by the remote topography of his likely Pakistani sanctuary, stymied by an al-Qaida network that remains well funded and highly disciplined, sidetracked by the distractions of the war in Iraq, and, perhaps most significantly, limited by deep suspicion of the United States among Pakistanis.

Prodded by the United States, Pakistan began an offensive along its northwest border this spring to flush out al-Qaida forces that had escaped from Afghanistan and to help find bin Laden.

But after suffering heavy casualties and causing civilian deaths that stirred opposition, the Pakistani army declared victory two weeks ago and announced that bin Laden was not in Pakistan.

Many U.S. intelligence officials are confident that he is, and that he is as dangerous as ever.

The war in Afghanistan inflicted severe damage on al-Qaida, forcing it to adapt to survive, intelligence specialists agree. Today, they say it largely functions as a loose network of local franchises linked by a militant Islamist ideology. But bin Laden remains much more than just an iconic figurehead of Islamic militancy, most U.S. intelligence officials now say. From a presumed hiding place on the Pakistani side of the Afghan-Pakistan border, he controls an elite terrorist cell devoted to attacking the United States, the officials say they suspect. They contend that he personally oversees the group of al-Qaida operatives, which he hopes to use for another "spectacular" event, like the Sept. 11 attacks.

Location unknown

U.S. counterterrorism analysts say this unit probably is dispersed, though they do not know where. This "external planning group" can communicate with regional affiliates around the world to work with them when needed, one senior intelligence official said. "There is a strong desire by bin Laden to attack the continental United States, and he wants to use the external planning mode to do it," the official said.

But the United States has failed to penetrate the group and has no idea when or where it will try to strike, the officials acknowledged. The contention of intelligence officials that such a group poses grave danger helps explain why the Bush administration continues to respond so strongly to reported terrorist threats; officials cannot tell which ones to take most seriously.

Intelligence officials would not provide any details of how they reached their conclusions about bin Laden's current role.

Many analysts are convinced that he is being protected by a well-financed network of Pakistani tribesmen and foreign militants who operate in the impoverished border region, and that they have helped him communicate with major figures in his network.

"Bin Laden is getting his logistical support from the tribes," said one intelligence official. "He still has operational communications with the outside."

The place suspected of being bin Laden's hideout, in the shadow of the Hindu Kush mountain range, is in one of the most isolated and backward corners of the world.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; alqaeda; binladen; jihad; laden; napalminthemorning; osamabinladen; pakistan; religionofpeace; souhtasia; terror; tribal; usamabinladen; waziristan; wot

1 posted on 12/13/2004 4:51:45 AM PST by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Dog; Coop; jeffers; Boot Hill

Pong


2 posted on 12/13/2004 4:54:20 AM PST by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder
USL is safe inside Iran, living in luxury as a hero.

That is the only reason we have not killed him yet.

3 posted on 12/13/2004 5:28:08 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (NO PRISONERS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert; Cap Huff; Coop; Boot Hill; jeffers
Search is stalled

You know what this means.... we will capture Bin Laden real soon.

Whatever the media declare I think the opposite.

4 posted on 12/13/2004 9:54:48 AM PST by Dog ( In memory of Sgt. Rafael Peralta, United States Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog; nuconvert; Cap Huff; Coop; jeffers
8 “Pakistan of little help in the hunt for bin Laden”

Looks like the Daily Breeze is breaking wind!

In addition to trying to place the blame by whining that "Pakistani officials...have escorted [CIA officers] wherever they travel in the Pakistani border region" (neither unexpected, unreasonable nor particularly onerous), the story reveals that, rather than the Pakistani government impeding the search, the search is being hampered by (1.)remoteness, (2.)topography, (3.)a well funded al-Qa'ida network, (4.)a highly disciplined terrorist network, and (5.)the CIA has limited resources and has more on its plate to do than just the search for OBL.

In several hints throughout the article, the Times authors make it pretty clear that the CIA is focusing their search in the remote and mountainous Chitral District of far northwestern Pakistan, adjacent to Afghanistan and surrounded by the winter-time Hindu Kush and the Himalayan mountain ranges. Any wonder then, why the search would be frustrating and seem to be in slow motion?

--Boot Hill

5 posted on 12/13/2004 12:52:45 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
mountainous Chitral District of far northwestern Pakistan

We had been discussing this area on another thread a while back. Good place to hide.

6 posted on 12/13/2004 1:11:03 PM PST by Dog ( In memory of Sgt. Rafael Peralta, United States Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog; nuconvert; Cap Huff; Coop; AdmSmith; jeffers
8 “We had been discussing [the Chitral] area on another thread a while back. Good place to hide.”

Which comment, of course, calls for a map! The Chitral District and the capital city of Chitral are located center-left in the map below. Note the proximity to Afghanistan and the rugged terrain.


multimap.com | The above map came from MultiMap.com. Click the logo on the left to visit
the best site on the internet for accurate and detailed maps of the entire world.

 
To orient yourself regionally, find the city of Gilgit in the upper-right of the map of Pakistan, below and in the center-right of the map above.


The Chitral district is world famous for its rugged beauty.


--Boot Hill

7 posted on 12/13/2004 2:16:27 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; GarySpFc

TJ, here is another example of your friends the Pakies. Yeah, great friends of ours alright. But of course you only tell the truth and you did state they are America's friends. Ha


8 posted on 12/15/2004 7:47:48 AM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Are you calling President Bush a liar?


9 posted on 12/15/2004 12:23:17 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe ("W" stands for "War President")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson