Posted on 12/12/2004 7:52:25 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
Hey Dummies!
There is no need to impeach Hanoi Kerry from the US Senate
He is there illegally!
Hanoi Kerry is in violation of
US Constitution 14th Amendment Section 3
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment14/
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President,
or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State,
who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress,
or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature,
or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States,
shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same,
or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Violation of 18 USC 2381
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002381----000-.html
Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States,
levies war against them or adheres to their enemies,
giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere,
is guilty of treason and shall suffer death,
or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined
under this title but not less than $10,000;
and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Violation of 18 USC 953
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000953----000-.html
Private correspondence with foreign governments
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States,
directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse
with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof,
with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government
or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes
or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply,
himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents
thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained
from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
Violation of UCMJ Section 904. ART. 104.
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj2.htm
AIDING THE ENEMY
Any person who--
(1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or
(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or [protects or gives intelligence to or
communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly;
shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct.
Petition to Investigate and Indict
Hanoi Kerry for acts of treason
http://patriotpetitions.us/kerry/
Timeline of Hanoi Kerry
http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html
VVAW, FBI files and John Kerry,
What stockpirate has found
http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/
Viet Nam Vets are NOT going away
until Hanoi Kerry is removed from office!
212 LINKS to Anti Kerry sites
News reports,
Viper's Vietnam Veterans Page
http://members.aol.com/ga1449ga/links/links.html
Contact your current
senators and representatives
and main stream right wing media
and find out why Hanoi Kerry still is in the US Senate.
Demand that this traitor is removed from the US Senate now!
Don't be like the silent majority in the 60's and 70's
and turn your back on America and cave in to the anti war minority.
Speak up for America today!
Distribute these url's!
EXPOSE HANOI KERRY!
Full details on these url's!
http://tonkin.spymac.net/hanoikerry1.html
There is a backup site
if the 1st url is unavailable.
http://stophanoikerry.150m.com
Of course Moral Clarity TM does apply to a reverend caught with a mistress and a love child on the side. It only applies to those eevil Republicans!
Sounds like a Rovian plot to me! Ha! That was a good one! The way I hear the Rats say they are going to ''fix'' the problems in their party is ,they are going to break off and form a new third party of radical lefty Dems cause they are mad that Hillary may try and go more towards the center to win in 2008. I dont think this will fix all the problems the RATS have but I hope they do form a new third party of Dims, with Howard Dean as their inspirational leader!They can call themselves the DeanacRATS OR DummycRATS or just plain the RAT party!
Oh, the shame.
Idiots aren't quoting the taglines in this thread.
I also noticed that they're too stupid to understand the insults. I still feel sorry for them. Tomorrow will be a shock. I truly hate seeing anyone get that hopeful only to have hopes dashed.
100 protestors?
wow...how underwhelming! Actually, pretty pathetic that that's all they could come up with in a state of that size. What's truly sad is that Ohio election boards are going to have to pay. Methinks that the Dems will pay the price next time.
Take names and give the IRS something to do.
BINGO! Give that man a cigar! heh,heh
Two words: Federal Courts.
Seems to me our side should be getting the same sort of movements going in Pennsylvania and other states that went "Blue", but only barely, and in which there have been "questionable" practices in Democratic controled areas. Just in case.
Interesting. Got a link?
Yeah. That describes DU. :-)
Uh, you're not supposed to be doing that either (posting stuff that has already been posted or posting duplicate articles).
What? You think that a judge or judges can't be found to overrule the law, precedent and even the Constitution itself? I'll bet there are plenty of them that would do that.
Nope. After tomorrow's Electoral College vote, the Constitution only allows the U.S. House jurisdiction in the election.
Courts are prohibited by law from this zone.
meaning they dupe me.
Looks like the demwits want to try the best of 4 out of 7 wins now.
Say it accurately next time then.
Yes, but the Constitution also says "...the right of the people shall not be infringed, but you didn't see any courts overturning the Brady Act or Assault Weapons ban as "infringements" did you? Then there are the prohibitions on the free exercise of religion, in clear violation of the First Amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.