you obviously have an idea of what i said or your recommendation would have been more polite. you didnt like what i said and so you decide to take a negative tone and act like you cant undertand it because the first letter in each sentence isnt capitalized.
I recognize that I often post my conservative opinion that Bush is wasting our money and lives in this rebuilding of Iraq. I have to realize that anyone who has a problem with that idea is going to resort to any childish and insignificant attack they can on me. For this reason I will use the caps lock so they can focus on other inane reasons to attack me rather than focusing on the issues in my post. Im curious to see how you liberals that call yourselves conservatives will act when us conservatives are in a position that we supported Bush but everything he is doing in Iraq is going to fail. How will we twist things to try to win the next election? I dont want a communist (democrat) to win so I hope Bush has something better planned for the future.
Amongst others..... If you really want someone to read what you wrote, you must make it readable.
I recognize that I often post my conservative opinion that Bush is wasting our money and lives in this rebuilding of Iraq.
How is this a conservative opinion? Did we all have a meeting and decide that this was going to be our platform?
I have to realize that anyone who has a problem with that idea is going to resort to any childish and insignificant attack they can on me.
I have a problem with you trying to present it as a conservative idea yes.
For this reason I will use the caps lock so they can focus on other inane reasons to attack me rather than focusing on the issues in my post.
If you can not be bothered to even attempt to communicate effectively I must conclude that you have nothing of worth to say. If you did then you would have tried to make your post something besides an unreadable mess.
This leads to the conclusion that even you don't put much stock in whatever it was that you were trying to peddle.
Im curious to see how you liberals that call yourselves conservatives will act when us conservatives are in a position that we supported Bush but everything he is doing in Iraq is going to fail.
I am curious about how you reached that conclusion. The problems in Iraq are confined to a small section of the country with the rest, especially in the north going quite well. I understand pessimism that not every thing will go smoothly but thinking that every thing will fail is not a position supported by logic.
By the way in my attempt to help you communicate more effectively I would like to point out that "you liberals that call yourselves conservatives" is not consistent with the "us conservatives" used later in the sentence. Either we are conservatives and therefore are actually not liberals or we are liberals in which case the use of "us" as a plural including the person you are addressing is improper.
Unless of course you are indeed a liberal calling himself conservative. In that case the us is proper.
How will we twist things to try to win the next election?
Why should we need to? Not everything in life is a stunning success you know. We have had enough success in Iraq already that there is no need to even attempt to twist things.
And more importantly why would we want to? Twisting and shading and lying is a liberal trick. It is not our style.
dont want a communist (democrat) to win so I hope Bush has something better planned for the future.
That is a very vague statement.
Rather then just say that you hope for something better tell us what would you like to see that would be better.
How would it be better? What are the costs involved? What would the benefits be? Is it even possible once you take into account national and international mindset and goals?
Do you have any plan that guaranteed success? Please share.