[Fatalis]

White House officials were clearly annoyed at Mr. Kerik for not determining the nanny's immigration status prior to this week, but said they had no evidence he had sought to mislead them. "It was Kerik's screw up, it was that simple," the official said. "But it's a mistake you can't tolerate with someone who has oversight for immigration."

She just came here to derail a Bush nomination that an American couldn't derail.

[Dane]

She just came here to derail a Bush nomination that an American couldn't derail.

Nah, she derailed a nomination that Pat Buchanan couldn't do in a column, and the NYT will have his wrath two fold, one she was hispanic, two she took what seemed like a good job.

Oh wait a minute, there is a third reason, The New York Times is doing the bidding of Pat Buchanan to bring down a Republican, no doubt that there will be a letter from Pat Buchanan, to Pinch Sulzberer, and the editors of the NYT, on the issue of nannies employed by Republicans, that issue is Pat Buchannan's and Tom Trancredo's perview exclusively and how dare the NYT tread on their turf.

I'm surmising that letter will also be CC'ed to Michelle Malkin.

[A CA Guy]

Like they are really going to do anything about illegal immigration.