[Luis Gonzalez]

They do not have to employ you, and they do not have to allow you on their property.

They don't even have to give you a reason why they fired you, they just have to pay their share of your unemployment.

You are all arguing squatter's rights here, your property is on THEIR property, and you were allowed access on their property pending certain regulations...if you do not meet those regulations, or violate work place rules, you are dismissed.

The only rights being attacked here, are the property rights of the business owner, whose rights to control access and use of his own property is being overturned by the Federal government in favor of the communal belief that you are entitled to property rights on someone else's property.

The SCOTUS will throw this out, and all you misguided fools will call them liberals, when in fact, the liberals here are you all.

[Dead Corpse]

No. I'm agreeing with you. Their property is their property. However, their property ENDS where mine begins. Period.

That just so happens to be where the rubber literally meets the road.

[Modok]

The only rights being attacked here, are the property rights of the business owner, whose rights to control access and use of his own property is being overturned by the Federal government in favor of the communal belief that you are entitled to property rights on someone else's property.
===
Because someones property is parked on your property does not make the other persons property yours. It is still theirs, not yours. You may ask them to remove their property off of your property, but you have no rights to enter what is theirs what is in their property. You are violating their property rights if you do, whether the law allows you to do so or not. You want all the respect for your rights but offer no respect for the property rights of others in return.