Also, as I AM disarmed while on their property, any criminal action that could have been prevented by allowing armed employees is now soley the burden of the property owner. I so much as get a bruise from a nutcase on a rampage on their property the business owner is 100% at fault and will be held fully culpable. Period. In criminal and in civil cases.
Communist? It is YOU that is saying an individual should give up their Rights for the communal good.
They do not have to employ you, and they do not have to allow you on their property.
They don't even have to give you a reason why they fired you, they just have to pay their share of your unemployment.
You are all arguing squatter's rights here, your property is on THEIR property, and you were allowed access on their property pending certain regulations...if you do not meet those regulations, or violate work place rules, you are dismissed.
The only rights being attacked here, are the property rights of the business owner, whose rights to control access and use of his own property is being overturned by the Federal government in favor of the communal belief that you are entitled to property rights on someone else's property.
The SCOTUS will throw this out, and all you misguided fools will call them liberals, when in fact, the liberals here are you all.