Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editor: Disclosure was needed on armor query
cnn ^ | 12-10-04

Posted on 12/10/2004 3:16:16 PM PST by LouAvul

CHATTANOOGA, Tennessee (AP) -- A newspaper should have told its readers promptly that an embedded reporter had helped frame a question that a serviceman asked of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld this week in Kuwait, the publisher says.

The question to Rumsfeld from Spc. Thomas "Jerry" Wilson, 31, of Nashville, Tennessee complaining that many military vehicles in Iraq are not adequately armored, has touched off a storm of new publicity about the issue.

"In hindsight, information on how the question was framed should have been included in Thursday's story in the Times Free Press. It was not," the paper's publisher and executive editor, Tom Griscom, said in a note to readers published Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armorflap; edwardleepitts; rumsfeld
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: BushisTheMan

BushisTheMan wrote:

This reporter is a SLIME!!!!!!!

.........................................

Can I get an AMEN!!!


21 posted on 12/10/2004 4:12:11 PM PST by phoenix0468 (One man with courage is a majority. (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468

Probably none. I think I remember reading that the reporter did this on a one-on-one situation.


22 posted on 12/10/2004 4:29:57 PM PST by NY Attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Rummy was set up and the soldier who asked the question must have been Butthead's brother he is so dumb. On Hannity today a spokesman,a solider from the front, said that the humvees that needed the steel got it "early" on all the rest the "upgrades" are all "recent" requests. This whole thing is more bogus rat/bs and as usual only one side is being reported.
23 posted on 12/10/2004 5:26:34 PM PST by rodguy911 ( President Reagan---all the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Okay, not the Fox guys. I was thinking more of the weasels from NYT, LAT, KC Red Star, etc.


24 posted on 12/10/2004 6:56:28 PM PST by FierceDraka ("Megatons Make It Fun!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vbob
And, of course, you have to wonder why the Army had so many vehicles without armor plating in the first place, don't you?

As I understand it, this goes back to the 1990's, when military budgets were less generous than they might be now. The Marines decided that all their Humvees would be armored, while the Army decided to go for quantity and only have a percentage armored.

As a result, the Marines ended up with all their Humvees being armored, while the Army ended up with a percentage being armored. Part of this would have to do with the intended use of the vehicles.

This would make a nice background filler to the original story, wouldn't it? Of course, it would require research and verification. You can't just depend on some anonymous Internet poster for your facts.

25 posted on 12/10/2004 7:03:14 PM PST by Bernard (Caution Ahead - Road being Paved with Good Intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson