Skip to comments.
'Smart gun' requirement still at least five years away
Newsday ^
| December 9, 2004
| STEVE STRUNSKY
Posted on 12/10/2004 10:07:54 AM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
12/10/2004 10:07:55 AM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
2
posted on
12/10/2004 10:08:46 AM PST
by
dbwz
(Self-Defense is a Basic Human Right -- 2asisters.org)
To: fourdeuce82d; Travis McGee; Joe Brower
3
posted on
12/10/2004 10:09:02 AM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
Do we really want guns that are smarter than some of the users?
To: neverdem
5
posted on
12/10/2004 10:15:53 AM PST
by
UseYourHead
(Smith & Wesson: The original point-and-click interface)
To: neverdem
One can have several gripping situations, like strong vs. weak hand shooting, various two-handed grips with weak hand overlapping or weak hand cupping support from below, for example. The smart system should ideally allow them all, and even allow the authorized user to shoot while standing on his head and using his left foot and right nostril to control the handgun, while preventing everyone else. Just imagine that in emergency situation the blasted system would lock you out...
6
posted on
12/10/2004 10:17:22 AM PST
by
GSlob
To: neverdem
Even if it works as promised, it will not placate the gun grabbers. It's the acquisition of the power to negate a constitutional right that drives them-safety and lives are irrelevant. It's the same as with the abortion supporters-it all boils down to power.
7
posted on
12/10/2004 10:18:11 AM PST
by
Spok
To: neverdem
How do gloves effect this?
8
posted on
12/10/2004 10:21:18 AM PST
by
umgud
To: neverdem
U.S. Rep. Robert Menendez, a Democrat who has helped secure funding for the research, said that 17,000 of the nation's 30,000 annual deaths related to handguns are suicides.. How will this technology prevent suicide from your own gun?
9
posted on
12/10/2004 10:22:52 AM PST
by
Ken H
To: neverdem

Yes, and criminals have never developed techniques to circumvent technology before, have they?
10
posted on
12/10/2004 10:25:25 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
To: neverdem
Researchers are making progress in developing "smart gun" technology, but it will still be at least five years before a New Jersey law requiring it can take effect, officials said Thursday. I propose that the police be forced to use these "smart guns" for 7 years to test their efficacy before forcing the general populace to submit to this new technology.
After all, if "smart guns" are everything the Liberals claim they are, then the government shouldn't have any problem putting its money where its mouth is, right? RIGHT?
11
posted on
12/10/2004 10:28:50 AM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
To: Spok
Even if it works as promised, it will not placate the gun grabbers. It's the acquisition of the power to negate a constitutional right that drives them-safety and lives are irrelevant. It's the same as with the abortion supporters-it all boils down to power. No kidding. I wonder whether every police car in NJ (and maybe nationwide, later) will have a radio transmitter that will deactivate all of the "smart guns?" No, strike that, I don't wonder - I'm certain that they will.
Thankfully, there are over 250 million guns in this country, with roughly 5-6 million new ones being produced or imported annually - those bastiches will have to wait a LOOOONNNNNGGGG time before any significant percentage of those guns become inoperable due to corrosion or the wearing out of parts. Oh, and the fact that there is now shall-issue on the books in 34 states says to me that there will be LOTS more "dumb" handguns sold before this type of a law could ever reach those states (and in many of them they wouldn't even be introduced, let alone passed).
Phuck the PRNJ. I am VERY glad to be out of there and living in Texas, Free America.
To: neverdem
Just wait for the first lawsuit where an authorized user can't fire his/her gun, and is either injured or murdered because of that. That's one products liability suit against a gun-maker that I would support wholeheartedly.
To: neverdem
So, are all the handguns going to provided with a laptop computer?
14
posted on
12/10/2004 10:31:37 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: umgud
Or a tense situation, such as when someone breaks into your house at 2 am?
15
posted on
12/10/2004 10:32:55 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
The day the President's secret service detail is exclusively armed with these guns will be the day that I consider adding one to my curio collection.
But for serious carry, it is a Colt 1911 with the grip safety pinned.
16
posted on
12/10/2004 10:33:48 AM PST
by
IGOTMINE
(One little, two little, three little Hadjis...)
To: Spok
I can guaranteee you that the government is looking at ways to disable these "smart guns" from a distance. They will probably have GPS tracking in them like the new cell phones do.
17
posted on
12/10/2004 10:34:36 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: UseYourHead
18
posted on
12/10/2004 10:38:32 AM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Bluegrass Conservative
THE ONLY TRUE, "SMART" GUN
ANYTHING ELSE IS BS.
19
posted on
12/10/2004 10:40:27 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
My idea of a smart gun is one that is guaranteed to hit the target.
20
posted on
12/10/2004 10:41:12 AM PST
by
umgud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson