Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dandelion

A three star general in Kuwait just stated on FOX that all Humvees going to Iraq would be armored.

Armor is not required nor desired on all Humvees. In fact for many missions the soldiers prefer unarmored Humvees because they are more agile.

But then Ted Kennedy, who doesn't even know how to drive a car across a bridge safely, and his ilk, wouldn't know the difference and believe that every mission in Iraq, requires an Abram tank.


24 posted on 12/09/2004 2:41:30 PM PST by matchwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: matchwood

Right On!Bob Grant(WOR/710/NYC)has always referred to the senior senator from mass as"Teddy,The Swimmer"!!!!!!!!!!!!


125 posted on 12/10/2004 6:00:12 AM PST by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: matchwood

Correct me if my thinking is wrong, but Humvees are a replacement for jeeps that were used for transportation. They were not meant to be a replacement for tanks. No amount of armor will protect from large land mines.

This is a different kind of war, and IMHO it requires a different kind of equipment to fight it.


235 posted on 12/13/2004 3:49:45 AM PST by chainsaw ( ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - H. Clinton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson