Why is the LA Times stating an obvious but politically incorrect truth?
Max Boot is politically incorrect.
This is just the beginning of the Lefts way of redefining itself over the next 4 years. We will see alot of this from the MSM.
Well its certainly out of character for that paper, but the column is probably not something over which they have a lot of editorial control.
Still, when these articles start appearing in that type of paper its a good sign that the MSM is being dragged kicking and screaming to the issue of the utter failure of the U.N.
Why is the LA Times allowing a known conservative like Max Boot (formerly of the WSJ editorial page) have ink?