Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet 'Gen Jones': Group was 2004's real swing vote
Denver Post ^ | 12/5/04 | Jonathan Pontell and J. Brad Coker

Posted on 12/09/2004 10:13:49 AM PST by qam1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-292 next last
To: Admin Moderator

DONE


241 posted on 12/09/2004 4:51:25 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I'm a monthly donor and all I get is this stupid tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Later


242 posted on 12/09/2004 4:52:18 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I'm a monthly donor and all I get is this stupid tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

LOL. Back atcha. FR Gen Xers are no more twits than FR boomers are, and with some exceptions, the Gen Xers are less likely to support government programs.

It's the Gen Xers and boomers that AREN'T on FR that are the primary problem we both have.


243 posted on 12/09/2004 4:52:44 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

Nite CG.....check the shed.


244 posted on 12/09/2004 4:54:54 PM PST by international american (Proudly posting without reading the article since 2003.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

LOL. I'm almost ready to say too bad, cause it was getting damn entertaining for both of us. Guy next door came by cause he heard me laughing at our insults flying back and forth. You give as good as you get, old timer. :)

And I am no RAT. Might be a little more oddball in my conservatism, maybe more radically so than most on FR, but I'm no fan of judicial expansionism or federal overreaching. Don't worry--much as we might bitch about having to carry the taxes the left stuck you and me with, most of the FR kids are all right.


245 posted on 12/09/2004 4:55:59 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

"the Gen Xers are less likely to support government programs."

If you read my post #216, it will show you how the average FReeper boomer feels about gov't programs.


246 posted on 12/09/2004 5:00:43 PM PST by international american (Proudly posting without reading the article since 2003.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

68s were a little bigger than I like, even though I generally like a bigger car as I'm 6'5". I prefer just to move the rails back in a `65--and up to 65 you can modify emissions any way you want in any state in the Union, too!

Don't worry. I don't reflexively judge people on their birthdate. But on threads like this, the lines get drawn pretty quickly by people trading blame. I suppose the only method of stopping that problem is to accept that we all will be part of the solution, and figure out a fair way to apportion the inevitable hit. Of course, that might take us back to the same can of worms. :)

I prefer to have friends who can be fierce adversaries in an argument and then not walk away angry. Guess that's why I disliked law school. Too many liberal pouters screaming about how I couldn't argue for such and such, because it was morally wrong to be on that side. Obviously, whether it's morally wrong in someone's view doesn't mean there's nobody who can argue that position, but they and many folks here think that simply ARGUING a position makes you morally evil for opposing them.

And I am planning. Part of the reason I exiled myself from Florida is taxes. When I come back to Florida, it will be with my retirement funds set. Not until.


247 posted on 12/09/2004 5:09:07 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: djreece
This is interesting, but it does conflict with what I had read here on FR that Gen X / Gen Reagan women were solidly in the Bush camp throughout the runup to the election. I don't have time to look up the article right now though.

It was this post

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1260568/posts

Bush was up by 8 in the 30-39 group, This was the Rasmussen poll

Here is what he has on his site

Generation Y (18-24 yr.olds): Kerry 59% Bush 40%
Generation X (25-39 yr olds): Kerry 50% Bush 48%
Generation Jones (40-49 yr.olds): Kerry 48% Bush 51%
Baby Boomers (50-59 yr. olds): Kerry 52% Bush 47%
Mature Generation (60 and older): Kerry 51% Bush 49%

I think he is fudging the numbers, He is using a poll from the NEP which didn't use those age brackets

Quote "These special age cross-tabulations of the NEP Polling highlight the importance of looking separately at actual generations of voters. The standard NEP Polling Report uses the arbitrary age categories of 18-29, 30-44, 45-59, and 60+, splitting Generation Jones in half. By lumping half of these conservative Jonesers in with the liberal Xers, and the other half with the also liberal Boomers, an important story of the 2004 election was hidden.

Cross-tabulations of polling from Rasmussen, Gallup, Zogby, Pew, ICR, and AP-IPSOS, released two weeks before the election, showed that Generation Jones women were the only generation of women who had consistently vacillated between Bush and Kerry in the six months before the election".

So basically picking and choosing polls BEFORE the election and pushing more liberals into Gen-X & the "True" Baby Boomers to get a result that Gen Jones matters most. (It must of pained him because reading his site he seems to lean liberal)

248 posted on 12/09/2004 5:13:49 PM PST by qam1 (Anyone who was born in New Jersey should not be allowed to drive at night or on hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: international american
Oh, I agree. Probably a vast majority here of every age would be against social security. But there are some boomer (and older folks) here that will defend their "right" to social security checks with mouth a-foaming, however.

I particularly dislike being told we as a nation owe someone tax money. I paid taxes, too, but I don't claim to deserve the right to loot the general fund when I retire. I do deserve to keep the money I earned in the first place, and that is what my kids deserve, and they will not be subject to the crushing tax burden most people take for granted if I can do anything about it.

249 posted on 12/09/2004 5:14:24 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: qam1

I dislike this Gen Jones stuff because I like Strauss and Howe's delineation and their explanation of how generations usually work. They went with twenty year cohorts that had shared experiences AND arrived at the ability to have kids at the same time, going back to the first generation here! Certainly there are people born on the cusp, and people who do not follow their generational stereotype. But the Gen Jones idea is just another way to attempt to invalidate the generational stereotype by breaking it down more. And in this case, it's a way for a liberal to say "WASN'T GEN X and WASN'T BOOMERS who voted Bush--it was THESE weirdos!"

In reality, it was ANOTHER particular group that voted for Bush: Americans who love their country.


250 posted on 12/09/2004 5:21:18 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

"In reality, it was ANOTHER particular group that voted for Bush: Americans who love their country."

Thank you.



251 posted on 12/09/2004 5:26:07 PM PST by international american (Proudly posting without reading the article since 2003.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: international american

So we both agree, I take it, that first impressions aren't always accurate. :)

Anyway, it's nice to have some posts on this thread, given the number removed by the mods. LOL.


252 posted on 12/09/2004 5:42:33 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Generation Y (18-24 yr.olds): Kerry 59% Bush 40%
Generation X (25-39 yr olds): Kerry 50% Bush 48%
Generation Jones (40-49 yr.olds): Kerry 48% Bush 51%
Baby Boomers (50-59 yr. olds): Kerry 52% Bush 47%
Mature Generation (60 and older): Kerry 51% Bush 49%

I am impressed with ourselves. We did it single-handed. The new greatest generation.

253 posted on 12/09/2004 5:42:45 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Laura Earl; Conspiracy Guy

Dang. I missed a mega-flame war :-)


254 posted on 12/09/2004 5:44:25 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Good to see you are still here, I'm seeing all those "Comment removed by Moderator" post above I was wondering when I replyed if I was going to get a "Account Banned or Suspended" message or not.

But I agree this Generation Jones thing is silly, Because by his account the Baby Boomers are 8 years, Gen Jones 10 and Gen-X 16 years long which makes no sense. I prefer the parental definition (Post #90) because the majority parents shape the majority of kids in any given year, But there is never going to be a perfect system for IDing Generations because the people at the end of one generation and the beginning of another are always going to be more similar to each other then the ones at the other end of their own generation.

OH and BTW, Since you are relatively new to the ping list you probably missed this one way back, Never call a Baby Boomer Gramps

255 posted on 12/09/2004 6:18:23 PM PST by qam1 (Anyone who was born in New Jersey should not be allowed to drive at night or on hills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
True. I can't understand people who claim to be conservative and then attack allies. It is insane and the FR gen Xer's do it more than anyone else. I choose to challenge it.
256 posted on 12/09/2004 6:56:23 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I'm a monthly donor and all I get is this stupid tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: international american

Later Brother!


257 posted on 12/09/2004 6:56:55 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I'm a monthly donor and all I get is this stupid tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Get in line. Only a united voice works.


258 posted on 12/09/2004 6:58:29 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I'm a monthly donor and all I get is this stupid tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
I understand. Never walked away from a fight unless I out armed the adversary to a point that it was embarrassing
259 posted on 12/09/2004 7:01:40 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I'm a monthly donor and all I get is this stupid tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Jump in! I am logging out to chill a while


260 posted on 12/09/2004 7:02:38 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I'm a monthly donor and all I get is this stupid tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson