Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highlandbreeze
If they will have armored vehicles, why did he say that they'd not have armour on vehicles to take up north with them?

Because some of the vehicles will not be armored.

551 posted on 12/09/2004 12:54:53 PM PST by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies ]


To: TexKat
"some of the vehicles will not be armored. "

But we have no knowledge that any of the "some" unarmored vehicles would have been occupied.

If over half of the unit was flying in, obviously some of the vehicles were planned to be trucked in, not driven.

http://209.215.156.25/Pressrel/04Dec/04-61%20Statement%20on%20Rumsfeld%20question%2008%20Dec%2004.htm
Maj. Gen. Gus L. Hargett, Adjutant General of Tennessee
Statement on questions by 278th Soldier to Secretary Rumsfeld

...I have been assured that no 278th soldier will go forward in a vehicle without at least “level 3” armor.

According to my information, 278th Vehicles that are not armored will be trucked forward and will not be occupied by soldiers... "

657 posted on 12/09/2004 1:36:54 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson