Not always so, go study the history of science. Scientists can be shockingly dogmatic about pet theories/concepts. One could say, some/many of them have almost a religious attitude towards evolution, amoung other things.
So what you're saying is that when science behaves like proponents of ID behave, science is wrong. What does that say about ID?
"So what you're saying is that when science behaves like proponents of ID behave, science is wrong. What does that say about ID?"
Incorrect. What I am saying is that supposedly disspassionate and logical "scientists" are far from that. So, the concept that science/scientists are only interested in facts, and not ruled by emotion, is bogus. Your offering characutures of ID proponents don't make them that way. Actually, the group that tends to push for ID are the "moderates" in the spectrum of those holding to some form of divine creation.