Skip to comments.
Revealed After 63 Years: the Truth Behind Pearl Harbor
The Scotsman ^
| December 9, 2004
| Julian Ryall
Posted on 12/08/2004 10:30:04 PM PST by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
1
posted on
12/08/2004 10:30:04 PM PST
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
2
posted on
12/08/2004 10:32:53 PM PST
by
PowerPro
(DOUBLE W - He's STILL the one. Now don't that feel GOOD????)
To: quidnunc
3
posted on
12/08/2004 10:34:06 PM PST
by
investigateworld
((Another Cali refugee in Oregon ))
To: quidnunc
And had the Japanese Embassy in Washington been allowed to use their typists (who where Americans), they could have delivered the message earlier. Instead, they were ordered not to allow anyone other than the Japanese diplomats and their aids to read the message and none of them could type. This caused an even further delay in delivering their message.
Without a Declaration of War, Japan attacked the United States' Pacific Fleet on Sunday morning, December 7th, 1941. No matter what their intentions may have been, it was sneak attack (in classic Japanese fashion) but in the end was a strategic disaster for them. Pearl Harbor insured that the war in the Pacific would be a war to the death and they learned that the hard way on August 6th and 9th, 1945.
To: quidnunc
Maybe its time we laid the blame for the attack on Pearl Harbor on the Japanese.The Army didn't do it. The Navy didn't do it. FDR and the federal government didn't do it.
5
posted on
12/08/2004 10:44:28 PM PST
by
oyez
(¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
To: quidnunc
I'll say it again: you post the best articles.
6
posted on
12/08/2004 10:46:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
(W, Still the President)
To: quidnunc
And we should believe this WHY??
Clearly this guy is on a mission to clear his Father's name
in the eyes of the US, (for God knows, the Japanese couldn't give a ratsass about this issue, and never have).
7
posted on
12/08/2004 10:47:13 PM PST
by
konaice
To: oyez
Maybe its time we laid the blame for the attack on Pearl Harbor on the Japanese.The Army didn't do it. The Navy didn't do it. FDR and the federal government didn't do it.
Most people don't blame FDR for Pearl Harbor, so I never really understood why liberal DemocRATS thought they could get away with blaming Bush for 9/11... (that really worked out well as a campaign issue for them, didn't it?)
8
posted on
12/08/2004 10:50:40 PM PST
by
mysto
To: quidnunc
Doesn't the movie Tora Bora make it clear that the message was withheld?
9
posted on
12/08/2004 10:52:39 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists and international criminals than they ever captured or killed)
To: COEXERJ145; quidnunc
The War Dept knew something was coming early December. Henry L Stimson's Diary, November 25, 1941 notes that they expected an attack, "for the Japanese are notorious for making an attack without warning."
I'm gonna sniff to try to fined some MAGIC diplomatic cables to try to find something on this. The whole situation was at its brink.
10
posted on
12/08/2004 10:59:48 PM PST
by
endthematrix
("Hey, it didn't hit a bone, Colonel. Do you think I can go back?" - U.S. Marine)
To: quidnunc
This isn't entirely news. The idea was, all along, to present the declaration of war such that there would be insufficient time to warn Pearl Harbor, but that would only be possible if everything in the communications chain went perfectly. To allow more time than that (from the Japanese military perspective) would be to risk everything going perfectly and actually allowing time for a warning. Hence they made sure their diplomats couldn't do that.
This, of course, put those poor guys on a seat so hot I wouldn't care to contemplate it. You can't get an uglier job than that as a diplomat. The presentation of that declaration prior to any bombs falling was their only real protection under international law, and it is a tribute to Roosevelt's restraint that he didn't have them shot when the bombs fell first.
It is laudable for the son to try to clear his father's name, but I don't think that name was really in question, at least in the United States. Whether the declaration was delayed by his incompetence is entirely irrelevant - he was set up from the beginning, and the bombs would have fallen anyway.
To: Billthedrill
Whether the declaration was delayed by his incompetence is entirely irrelevant - he was set up from the beginning, and the bombs would have fallen anyway.
Well said. I agree.
12
posted on
12/08/2004 11:19:09 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(Trees are a renewable resource you idiots.)
To: Billthedrill
We had crackes that particular diplomatic code, so we knew what was in the last message.
What is new in this article is that the military attachés in the Japanese embassy were responsible for delaying the transmission.
If this information is true then the Japanese ambassadors Nomura and Kurusu have gotten a bum rap.
13
posted on
12/08/2004 11:28:03 PM PST
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: endthematrix
The War Dept knew something was coming early December. Henry L Stimson's Diary, November 25, 1941 notes that they expected an attack, "for the Japanese are notorious for making an attack without warning." Yes, but did they have any idea what? My recollection is that the planes were arranged in rows for the purpose of preventing anyone from being able to sneak among them unobserved. Had the Japanese been intending to have bombs hand-planted by saboteurs, this might have been a good defense. Unfortunately, it was ineffective against the threat that actually materialized.
14
posted on
12/08/2004 11:30:37 PM PST
by
supercat
(If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
To: quidnunc
Quaint isn't it. The notion that our government would get riled up by a country not declaring war first. That norm lasted for a few centuries to protect nations from such "sneek attacks." It's long gone now -- along with the rest of codified "international law," which is being plowed under by the terrorists of the International Criminal Court.
To: quidnunc
BUMP.
Marking place for tomorrow's read.
16
posted on
12/08/2004 11:37:23 PM PST
by
onyx
(A BLESSED & MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL.)
To: konaice
And we should believe this WHY??
Clearly this guy is on a mission to clear his Father's name
in the eyes of the US, (for God knows, the Japanese couldn't give a ratsass about this issue, and never have).
________________________________________________________
Actually you have it backwards. This guy certainly has a bias, but he is trying to clear his father and lay the blame on the Japanese Army. And as the article points out, another historian was murdered for a controversial WWII opinion recently.
So I would say at least some in Japan "give a ratsass" about this.
17
posted on
12/08/2004 11:46:35 PM PST
by
JLS
To: konaice
This has been common knowledge for years. I can remember being told this story when I was in high school. I graduated in 1959...Japan deliberately withheld the last paragraph. End of story.
18
posted on
12/08/2004 11:54:49 PM PST
by
calex59
To: JLS
And as the article points out, another historian was murdered for a controversial WWII opinion recently. So He says.
Why would it matter in the end if it was the Military, the Diplomats, or the Emperor himself?
It matters to him, but not to us. I suspect the message was delivered exactly when it was intended to be.
19
posted on
12/08/2004 11:56:28 PM PST
by
konaice
To: CaptIsaacDavis
Very Observant.
Had the message been delivered ahead of time, the impact would have been the same.
These days, we considder ourselves luck if anyone takes responsibility after the fact.
20
posted on
12/09/2004 12:01:35 AM PST
by
konaice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson