Posted on 12/08/2004 10:15:51 AM PST by SmithL
A controversial Bush administration plan that will triple the timber harvest in the Sierra as a means of fireproofing the region's national forests now appears locked in, with opinions ranging widely and fiercely about its likely effects on the ground.
The Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment -- the brainchild of Bush administration appointee Jack Blackwell, the U.S. Forest Service regional forester for California -- supersedes the Sierra Nevada Framework, a Clinton- era scheme fully implemented in 2001 that emphasized ecological restoration and halted most logging throughout the Sierra's 11 national forests and one special management area.
Blackwell's amendment has been the working model for the Sierra's national forests since January, but until it was officially affirmed by forest service chief Dale Bosworth in November, it was not considered a permanent plan.
At this point, the only way that the amendment can be altered is through a "discretionary review" by Mark Rey, the undersecretary of natural resources and environment for the U.S. Department of the Interior. But such a move is extremely unlikely; Rey has a Dec. 15 deadline to initiate a review and has not signaled any such inclination.
Environmentalists generally were enraged by Blackwell's plan.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Kooks.
You took the words out of my mouth. A few years ago, I heard a member of an environmental group chastising the forest service for using *gasp* timber companies to accomplish the necessary thinning. The evil profit motive means that we can't trust the companies to accomplish the goal. Somebody might make a buck! Can't have that. The solution, it seems, is for the Forest Service to hire people to do any necessary thinning. I didn't hear any proposal for what to do with the timber that had been removed. Probably wanted it to be piled and burned, because it certainly couldn't be sold to a company that might use it for something, and make a dollar.
And as we all know, old growth trees are holy objects to be preserved and worshipped.
We have a huge asset in these forests.....and it is a renewable source. Not using these assets defies logic.
I go back to my old statement: "God made nothing in nature for the sheer sake of beauty". That's what the stars are for....to observe and admire a magnificent system".
I can understand the enviros' position on this. The drive up the Sierras on I-80 from Reno is a lovely view of burned-out, fire-ravaged, eroding hills caused by years of uncontrollable forest fires.
So does everything else, because whatever is going on at the moment is always a handy vehicle for raising money. This applies to almost all the big non-profit organizations - the National Rifle Association, AARP, the NAACP, Planned Parenthood, etc.
Let the Environmentalists tie themselves to the old trees!! Ya that's the ticket let them tie themselved to the trees during hunting season.....
Do they think home owners and businesses who were burned to the ground aren't enraged? Fires have burned more trees due to ridiculous environ_MENTAL policies, than would have been cut and sold in the first place. Not to mention all the additional trees that were cut down to rebuild the structures that were burned down. These wackos are real nut cases.
The forests WILL be thinned. We can participate or nature will do it for us.
hehehee....you know? These peeps REALLY are weird.
"Arent trees kinda like....real big grass....ummmmmmm....(hit off of my bong).....you know dddduuuuuudddeeee....we should therefore defend every blade of grass on every lawn across the US....yea...(exhales...then takes another hit).....we should protest John Deere, Toro, Black and Decker and Craftsmen lawnmower makers as mass murderers of grass.....Kewel!"
/sarcasm off
Tree size has nothing to do with age.
There are many trees that mature very early!
Many different types of pines reach full maturity in 20 to 30 years.
That sure doesn't make them 'old growth'.
Has anyone ever considered logging wide firebreaks through the woods in some kind of scientifically planned pattern?
Wouldn't this answer two problems at once?
Go here: HFQLG Pilot Project if you want to read more about the project.
BTTT!!!!!!
Yes, let them tie themselves to the top, just before the chainsaw clears it's throat :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.