Posted on 12/08/2004 6:00:38 AM PST by gab1279
Even though the House of Representatives has now passed an historic intelligence Reform bill, additional steps still need to be taken to make America more safe and secure in the future. Permanency is good news, but it's not enough. This committee will need stature and clout real jurisdiction to provide rigorous oversight over the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).[snip]
Mr. Hastert recently told the House Republican Conference that he would establish a permanent homeland-security committee in the 109th Congress, which opens in January. He could have let the Select Committee expire and opted for easier fixes, such as establishing a new subcommittee for an existing standing committee. This would have pleased a number of chairmen who strongly argued the case against permanency, but Mr. Hastert saw that the harder road for the House was the right one for a safer America. With the executive branch organized around DHS as the focus of the nation's counter-terrorism efforts, it is difficult to imagine why the Congress would want to perpetuate a piecemeal approach to homeland-security issues, with literally dozens of committees and subcommittees engaged in oversight of DHS. We are encouraged that the speaker rejected this course.
It is certain we will have made no progress if the new committee isn't given broad legislative and oversight jurisdiction over DHS programs and activities, especially those focused on the department's core counterterrorism mission. That will require carving out a portion of a few standing committees' existing jurisdiction, certain to be a contentious task. In our view, however, it would be better to have no committee at all, than to create a hollow committee too weak to guide DHS effectively and that simply adds to the congressional bureaucracy. This job must be done right, or not at all.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Newt always has such sensible, spot-on recommendations. He may have his quirks and faults, but I think he's a sharp guy and served us well.
BTTT
"more safe?"
I guess English grammar are not Newt & Tommy's strong suit. LOL
how about "safer"...LOL
And we don't need another "investigation" or "committee"
what we do need are troops on the borders! Hellooooooooo
And until the W administration and Congress start enforcing the immigration laws in this country and securing the ports and borders there is no "Homeland Security!"
Point, Game, Set, Match!
This article shows how some of the millions of dollars are already being spent on counter terrorism...DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
$38 million to improve the FBIs intelligence capability, including a new Office of Intelligence to coordinate intelligence requirements and collection, additional language translators, and additional surveillance staff;
$60 million for counterterrorism investigations;
$55 million to combat cybercrime; and
$52 million to protect the United States from foreign government intelligence operations and espionage.
(BTW, that Office of Intelligence is within, of all places, the Energy Dept.)
There is a vast array of programs already in place to handle terrorism, much more than what I've listed here. All I see is the deck chairs being moved around. Instead of fixing any existing problems we see the usual response of government...never ending expansion.
Someday, with the best of intentions, it's going to step on us all while the blind continue bumbling along...
Beltway english. I think it is called Beltglish or something like that...
Makes things more better...
Some information for you above.
Thanks- copied & saved.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.