[DBrow]

I have not yet seen this addressed on FR

.........................

A while back there was a FReeper named Michael Rivero who had lots and lots to say about Admiralty Flags, among other things.

It's been discussed a lot and most feel that it is a decorative flag, while to others it is a symbol of some sort of conspiracy to steal our constitutionally regulated judicial system and replace it with something else.

As a conspiracy theory it's one of the more fun ones, there is lots of good stuff to read and it does not carry the kook stigma that "grassy knoll" does.

[Denver Ditdat]

A while back there was a FReeper named Michael Rivero who had lots and lots to say about Admiralty Flags, among other things.

Rivero - now there's a blast from the past. He was claiming that the government orchestrated the events of 9/11/2001 even before the second tower fell in NYC. That was his last day on FR.

There's a fascinating case study and subsequent novelized adaption waiting in Rivero for some enterprising psychoanalyst.

[ChefKeith]

the kook stigma that "grassy knoll" does.

So does this mean that you believe in the "majic bullet" theory?

[Polybius]

A while back there was a FReeper named Michael Rivero .............

Did he ever admit that the U.S. did not sink the Kursk before he was banned?

[MinuteGal]

It's only natural to bring up Michael Rivero's name when discussing the fringe element.

Leni

[weegee]

If it is purely decorative and holds no "significance" then the court should have no problems with replacing it with a non-fringed flag if a defendent so chooses (he brings his own American flag), no?

Odd that the "fringe" would push for a flag with "no fringe".