Posted on 12/07/2004 6:13:38 PM PST by yonif
BEIJING (Reuters) - Tech giant IBM (IBM.N: Quote, Profile, Research) is selling its PC-making business to China's largest personal computer maker, Lenovo Group Ltd. (0992.HK: Quote, Profile, Research) , for $1.25 billion, Lenovo said on Wednesday.
"Lenovo has acquired IBM's personal services business for $1.25 billion," Liu Chuanzhi, chairman of Lenovo Group Ltd., told reporters in Beijing.
He said the deal would make Lenovo the world's no. 3 personal computer maker.
Interesting, no news of this in the press release/latest news section of IBM's corporate website.
Use your personal computer to watch NBC's late night comedy programs.
This was been talked about for some time......
Guess the rumors were true..
Broadcast TV. How quaint. ;-)
I hope this means America can in turn invest in China too. Story is official, also being reported by Bloomberg.
It's there.
According to what I heard on fox News earlier, IBM only sold a controlling interest - IBM still owns a good chunk of it.
So the rumors were true, indeed.
What happened to the security concerns about transferring high-tech to China? Yes, this is only PCs, but it gives them a big foot in the door.
Most of the motherboards come out of Taiwan.......
I wonder if we trade with them in sufficiently high volume whether they will never go to war with us because of the high cost to their economy.
Then again, if we are dependent upon them and they are sufficiently advanced, they might invade anyway.
Who knows? The Shadow, maybe.
But it will be interesting to see if the IBM machines lose ground vis the competition due to loss of the IBM brand name. Nonetheless, almost all PC components are produced in China, Taiwan, S. Korea, Indonesia anyway, just like almost all of our clothing.
Capitalism-loving, free enterprise, freedom loving democratic People's Republic of China now owns the IBM brand and will market worldwide -- uh, well at least the Party owns it..
SOP for state owned enterprises in the "free traders'" Chi-com capitalist heaven is stealing intellectual property.
"Lenovos new 3G cellphone rips off the PlayStation Portable"
http://www.engadget.com/entry/6831627748437149/
Isn't it ironic that now an arm of IBM, the great American technology company, could now be making equipment for the Chinese military?
It's amazing.
I believe that the stronger the trade ties, the less the chance of armed conflict. War is simply bad for business (with isolated exceptions). Nonethess, a strong argument can be made, based on history, that trade conflicts often lead to warfare, even among trading "partners". However, I conclude that, in the current era, it is far less likely that conflicts among trading partners will result in warfare as a resolution. Thus I agree with your premise.
HUH?
These aren't mainframes.....
Intel and AMD.....and VIA (a taiwan company) make the processors.....all over the world.....
related thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1296587/posts
if my prediction is right, that the yuan is going to float or be re-pegged at a different level, expect china to go on a shopping spree for US companies before the revaulation.
IBM laptops/notebooks are the best. What will happen to the quality now?
some bullet points:
- "The PC business at IBM posted a loss of $50 million on sales of $2.84 billion in the third quarter."
- Michael Dell, chairman of the PC maker that bears his name, said the combination probably will fail.
``When was the last time you saw a successful merger or acquisition in the computer industry?'' Dell told reporters during an Oracle Corp. conference in San Francisco. ``It hasn't happened. It hasn't happened in a long, long time.''
source for quotes http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000006&sid=aHNEaiLHd7P0&refer=home
comment: this gives China a greater stake in the world economy. they need the US market to make their investment profitable, so they will need to work within certain standards to gain cooperation. this can turn into a win-win situation as long as it's two way, but there is no escaping we need to be successful on a number of fronts - education, R&D investment, infrastructure, taxes, trade, policy, etc. - to maintain our global competitiveness.
I assume this will in turn give IBM entre into China with their global services which, given its higher profitability, would be a net plus for IBM (unless we read a few years down the line that they have to sell that too to the Chinese because they cannot compete. By then it may be unclear who "they" are anyway since it has become such a global business.)
I'm glad to see Michael Dell's comment, because that occurred to me, too.
Back in the days when Japan was riding high, they bought up a lot of US companies and properties. On the whole they haven't done very well with them.
China has a ton of dollars. Hundreds of billions, maybe a trillion, who knows? But taking over the world isn't easy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.