To: Howlin
"You have to know EXACTLY where he was fishing for the bodies to surface where they did." 'Splain that one to me like I was a third grader. Your statement doesn't make sense to me. I suggest that if you drop something that floats into deep water weighed down and it somehow becomes disengaged from the weights at some later time after currents and tides have changed multiple times, you would have no idea where that object might surface.
259 posted on
12/07/2004 9:51:17 AM PST by
Positive
(Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
To: Positive
The bodies weren't suppose to submerge!!! Scott was as free as a bird until that occurred!! You missed the point AGAIN!!
275 posted on
12/07/2004 9:59:56 AM PST by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Positive
Ooops...The bodies weren't suppose to SURFACE(not submerge)
278 posted on
12/07/2004 10:02:17 AM PST by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Positive
I suggest that if you drop something that floats into deep water weighed down and it somehow becomes disengaged from the weights at some later time after currents and tides have changed multiple times, you would have no idea where that object might surface. Goodness, have you not being paying ANY attention? The tide charts PROVE that where he said he was fishing is the EXACT spot where the bodies would have had to have been dumped for them to come ashore where they did.
It's a SCIENCE, you know.
339 posted on
12/07/2004 11:29:24 AM PST by
Howlin
(W, Still the President)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson