Posted on 12/06/2004 10:28:27 PM PST by kattracks
Commentators on our country explain our blue-red division in many ways -- liberal-conservative; secular-religious; North-South; coasts-heartland; singles-married with children.I propose one more explanation: the easily offended-the not so easily offended.
With the acknowledgment that there are many individual exceptions, a major defining characteristic of modern-day liberalism is the ease with which liberals take offense personally and/or on behalf of others.
Liberals regularly portray as offended women, African Americans, Jews, American Indians, gays and every other group liberals declare a minority, i.e., any group that votes Democrat -- no group that votes Republican, such as Mormons, Cuban Americans and Vietnamese Americans, is considered a "minority." All other groups are constantly warned that almost anything they say that is not patronizing of those groups is offensive (and therefore subject to litigation).
Having given thousands of lectures across the country and on all seven continents (yes, Antarctica, too) over the past 30 years, I can vouch for the personal-offense element. I am continually astounded at how often members of the audience (usually liberal women) will say they are offended by something I said, when what they really mean is that they don't agree with me.
It is most unlikely that conservative men or women speak that way -- saying, "I am offended" -- when they hear liberal speakers.
For one thing, conservatives are so used to being labeled as stupid, bigoted, ignorant, racist, homophobic, sexist, insensitive and intolerant that it is almost impossible to offend them. Moreover, the culture does not allow them to feel offended, since they are not an officially designated minority.
For another, liberal positions are far more emotion-based than reason-based.
To cite but one of many examples, take the widely held liberal slogan "War is not the answer." It is pure irrationality. War has ended more evil than anything the left has ever thought of. In the last 60 years alone, it ended Nazism and the Holocaust; it saved half of Korea from genocide; it kept Israel from national extinction and a second Holocaust; it saved Finland from becoming a Stalinist totalitarian state; and according to most of the people who put "War is not the answer" stickers on their bumpers, it saved Bosnian Muslims from ethnic cleansing.
The list of irrational, feelings-based liberal positions is almost as long as the list of contemporary liberal positions. The relevant point here is that people who take positions based on feelings will of necessity take disagreement more personally and feel offended more often than others.
Liberals' claims of being offended themselves or on behalf of a selected group are almost endless.
Liberal Jews and non-Jews claim that "Merry Christmas" offends Jews and other non-Christians. That 90 percent of Americans celebrate Christmas is of no importance to the easily offended.
Liberal blacks and other liberals see racism almost everywhere in America. To cite a typical example, the absence of black musicians in major orchestras has frequently been named as an example of white racism, despite the fact that many orchestras audition musicians behind a curtain. To non-liberals, the reason probably lies in the fact that few black kids learn to play the oboe or viola. And the sad result of liberals taking offense at so much white behavior is that many whites now talk very guardedly and unnaturally to blacks.
Liberal American Indian spokesmen and other liberals regularly tell us how offensive Indian names of sports teams are. The latest polls show that most Indians have no problem with such names, but liberals are still offended on their behalf. To make the point of how offensive the name "Indians" is for the Cleveland baseball team, one liberal caller once asked me, "How would you feel if a team were named 'Jews'?" I told him that it would be a great day in Jewish history -- for 3,000 years, Jews have been looking for fans.
Part of America remains the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. An almost equally large part is now the Land of the Easily Offended and the Home of the Hypersensitive. Which land we become is a big part of the second American civil war we are fighting.
You're welcome.
Since you were up I figgered that I'd give you something to do.
Doh! Packwood, NOT Proxmire.
Thanks for today's lesson! (But I'm going to keep my cat, sorry...and my Corona with the lime....)
FOFL! Superb response.
Prairie
The correct answer to your question is "yes".
Actually, I personally lean towards #2 in your list, but am ecumenical and will embrace all. I don't go in for the religious wars you sometimes see on the subject.
;-)
This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of good stuff that is worthy attention. I keep separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson, Lee Harris, David Warren, Orson Scott Card. You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about).
"The ones that I have met are undereducated. Never met one with a college degree in business, law, economics, or engineering... I believe that liberals are incapable of logic, cause and effect, reponsibility, accountability, and telling the truth."
--Actually, academia is full of liberals. At the law school I attend, out of 50 faculty members, there are TWO registered Republicans. The coocoon of academe allows them to live in an emotional world which is devoid of hard logic....the logic of economics. David Horowitz, a converted liberal, once told me that liberalism allows the person to feel morally superior and it gives the individual great psychological comfort to "take care" of others with someone else's money. That's the best explanation of the psychological motivation for liberalism I've ever heard. I agree wholeheartedly that liberals are emotional creatures and we're logical. We approach problems as managers, not mommies.
Not all of us carry the gene..........
That great lesson which was emailed to me last night went out to my sons, dil and a lot of nephews and nieces last night including a liberal niece. Her parents got it last night and called her this morning to reinforce it.
It is amazing how many conservatives like my oldest son and I, have allergies to cats.
That son and I both like to stick a slice of lime down into the bottle of a Mexican Beer in the Summer. Our younger son, a recovering liberal, taught me to squeeze/stick a slice of lemon into the various lighter summer micro brews.
Cogent.
Thanks for the ping!
Being called a National Socialist by a guy who wants to reject Jesus and join a socialist nation is pretty fun stuff.
I've got four.
Gread read Ray. Thanks for the ping. I would have been offended if you hadn't.
I have one and have no problems. Allergic to cats !?! I am offended.
Unfortunately, the franchise is not linked to maturity or wisdom.
Yeah, I'm offended too! (see tagline)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.