Posted on 12/06/2004 8:02:26 PM PST by Happy2BMe
10,000 Troops Get Iraq Extension
Associated Press
December 2, 2004
WASHINGTON - With the insurgency still a threat to Iraq's planned elections, the U.S. force is about to expand to its highest level of the war - even higher than the initial invading force in March 2003.
The force will grow from 138,000 today to about 150,000 by mid-January, the Pentagon said Wednesday.
Extra troops are needed to bolster security before the national elections scheduled for Jan. 30. The increase in troop strength also underscores the fact that, despite enormous effort and cost, American commanders have yet to train and equip enough Iraqis for security duty.
Lt. Gen. Lance Smith, deputy commander of Central Command, which is responsible for U.S. military operations throughout the Middle East, told reporters at the Pentagon last month that the insurgents have managed to intimidate many Iraqis into not cooperating with the Americans.
The expansion of the U.S. force also recalls assertions made by some Bush administration officials when the invasion was launched that although stabilizing the country would not be easy or cheap, it certainly would not require more U.S. troops than it took to topple Baghdad.
s it turns out, the post-invasion period has been far costlier in blood and treasure than almost anyone predicted. When President Bush declared major combat operations were over May 1, 2003, the United States had about 148,000 troops in Iraq - slightly more than when the war began two months earlier and more than were there when Baghdad fell in early April.
The Pentagon said Wednesday that Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld approved a plan to send 1,500 soldiers of the 82nd Airborne Division from Fort Bragg, N.C., to Iraq this month and to extend by 60 days the combat tours of about 10,400 soldiers and Marines in Iraq who were to come home in January.
Most of those whose tours are being extended will serve two months longer than the 12-month tours the Army set as a standard limit to avoid putting too much stress on troops and their families.
The 12,000-troop increase is to last only until March, but it says much about the strength and resiliency of an insurgency that U.S. military planners did not foresee even a year ago, when they were focused on capturing deposed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
Pentagon officials said they preferred to expand the force in Iraq mainly by keeping some troops there longer rather than sending thousands of fresh troops from the United States.
"They are the most experienced and best-qualified forces to sustain the momentum of post-Fallujah operations and to provide for additional security for the upcoming elections," a Pentagon statement said.
The military normally is reluctant to extend soldiers' combat tours because of the potential negative effect it could have on their families, and thus on their willingness to remain in uniform. In this case, Gen. George Casey, the most senior U.S. commander in Iraq, decided it was necessary to keep up pressure on the insurgents while providing security for the elections.
One unit, the 2nd Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division, is being extended for the second time. Its soldiers originally were told they would be going home in November at the end of a 10-month assignment, but in October they got the news they would remain until mid-January. Now they are being extended until mid-March.
Rumsfeld's decision also applies to:
-About 4,400 troops of the 2nd Brigade of the 25th Infantry Division, which is operating in north-central Iraq. They will stay until mid-March, instead of departing in early January. Those soldiers' home bases are mostly in Hawaii.
-About 2,300 members of the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, based in Okinawa, Japan, Hawaii and California, who will stay until mid-March instead of leaving in January.
-About 160 soldiers of the 66th Transportation Company, based in Germany. They were due to depart Iraq in early January but instead will stay until early March.
The Army generally relies upon the 82nd Airborne to keep one of its three brigades on short-notice alert year-round to deploy abroad if there is a crisis. Shortly before the October elections in Afghanistan, about 600 members of the 82nd Airborne were sent there to strengthen security.
Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., a critic of the administration's handling of the war, said the Pentagon's announcement confirmed that the effort to stabilize Iraq would take years, with no certainty of success.
"This announcement makes it clear that commanders in Iraq need more troops and that this will be a long and very expensive process for the United States," Reed said. "It is still not clear whether Iraq will emerge from this chronic violence as a viable and stable country."
Very true, but that concept is quite foreign to most of our culture. The real problem here is that those who volunteered for service have been deceived by deviation from past practice and by unilateral contract modifications. As this continues our military will suffer major attrition and recruiting problems.
It will improve morale. Another symbol that Iraq is on it's way to democracy, even if a small step.
My grandfather was away in WW2 for 3 yrs. This is as serious, actually more serious, of a war.
Ridiculous to compare WW2 and Iraq? Iraq is part of the Middle East and in many ways it is more serious as the terrorism we are forced to deal with after 9/11 involves cowards that hide as civilians and share the goal of destroying the USA. These troops are facing an enemy even worse than the Nazis and Japs of WW2. We are in a fight for survival really as these people look at ways to attack and kill us. Iraq is part of the war on terrorism and these extensions show the seriousness of what we have to deal with.
"Ridiculous to compare WW2 and Iraq?"
Yes. There is no comparison. They are completely different situations.
They are comparative in the seriousness to world security. The war on terror is a global war only it is fought by murderers who don't wear uniform and are united with regimes that rally around their call to destroy the United States.
My son, also. He got the news to extend the day he was due to rotate. His group was sent to Najaf because they weere the most fit. The First Cav had just arrived, was as green as grass and got its butt kicked at first.
Juan usually makes a good soldier.
Will be one step further on toward an Iraqi government.
I talked with a National Guard recruiter at a gun show here in Oregon recently. According to him, enlistments are *way* down and the services generally are really worried about it. They're not getting any response from highschool seniors.
The services are trying to use "theme marketing" to get enlistments - "be all that you can be", etc. - and it's not working. I guess I'm not surprised at that - for my money, they'd do better to use an outright patriotic appeal, complete with photographs of 9/11 and combat footage.
But, what do I know...
Let me repeat. I am in conversation with a woman in the unit whose husband is at brigade level.
She knows HOW it went down.
I'm certain of my facts.
I have an unimpeachable source about what was told those families.
I have an unimpeachable source about what was told those families.
Nah....it's not a quagmire. No way!
And when we fought the Japanese and Germans we had no traitors in this country working for the enemy, no lawyers at the front and our people were united.
We had better be looking for an exit strategy.
We were originally told they would probably be gone 12 to 14 months (they left at the beginning of January). Then last summer, they had changed that date and were planning to send the ___ Brigade home NLT the first part of December (most were coming back the end of November). That was recinded in the first part of October when we got that news that the ___ Brigade Combat Team was being "extended" until January. It really wasn't an extension at all, they just were going back to their original plan. This latest change of plans to March actually still puts them in the original timeframe (14 months).They keep reminding us that "we told you to expect 12 to 14 months". It still was a blow - we thought surely they would send them home after their year was up.........
Hope that clears up the confusion.
Have a great day!
That's right in the ballpark.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.