A Corporate Election (Barbra Streisand blames "corporations" for her candidate's election loss)

Babs' Blog ^ | December 6, 2004 | Barbra Streisand

[jscd3]

Sigh...if only the simple folk in Hollywood had Corporations at their disposal to spread their message and provide funding, THEN things would have turned out different...

(hahahahahahahahaha)

[Stoat]

[theDentist]

So corporations defeated Kerry?

YEEEHAAAW! Stocks and Mutual Funds for everybody!!!

[Trippin]

Good Lord, Barbs is starting to sound like a DUmmie. S'pose it's just the next step in the left's apparent evolutionary regression.

[konaice]

She's Still here?

[Chode]

[TheRatHunter]

"STREISAAAAAAAND! GO AWAY!"

[Embraer2004]

Poor Barbra, she's gone "Nuts". She is no longer a "Funny Girl" or "Yentl". Can you pass the Prozac, please?

[Lorianne]

Actually, minus the whining, Ms. Streisand has a good point about the verifying process in elections as we go toward totally digital voting. I have concerns as well. It seems too easy for someone to hack the system, particularly someone(s) on the iside .... whichever way they wanted the election to go. When we are talking about razor thin margins in many states to begin with, some way of verifying votes needs to be employed.

[citizencon]

Streisand equates singing talent with intelligence. I din't understand a thing she said.

[Dan from Michigan]

This coming from some overrated joke who has at least 200 times the money I have.

[marajade]

I guess she musta missed it when Kerry campaigned that he had over 200 CEOs from various corporations on his side and that was how he was going to change the economy.

[drt1]

Will this A$$hole just shut up! What about Soros, the army of people who got rich in the dot.com bubble (McAuliffe (Global Crossing), Lockhart (AOL), etc., etc.) and who directly robbed millions of Americans of their savings, the foreign entities influence on the elections (Notice the price/barrel of oil dropping after the election?) and so on and on. For this idiot to suggest that somehow all of us are being led around by the nose, roboticly responding to the "Corporate" requirements is insulting. She is just mad because she and her band of rich, out-of-touch hypocrites (Spelled "Celebrities") are not able to influence us in the manner she has been told she is entitled to do by virtue of her status as an MSM icon.

[D-fendr]

refuse to offer a verifiable auditable paper trail for each vote?

Gee Babs, get with the program. MoveOn's major goal is to NOT have the paper trail, 'cause it suppresses the vote, doncha know?

[garyhope]

I think it's very nice of Ms. Streisand to finally expose George Soros's "Democratic" party meddling with the recent election. All of his money changing and currency speculation corporate funds were a scandal. I'm glad the "liberals" are finally talking about it.

Shall I put a sarcasm alert here?

[Inspectorette]

Does anyone seriously believe that she wrote this herself? She doesn't even have enough brain power to write this drivel...

[Graybeard58]

When we are talking about razor thin margins in many states to begin with, some way of verifying votes needs to be employed.

We still use punch cards where I live and I don't have any way to make sure my vote was recorded either.

[winner3000]

Babs' blog. Wouldn't that make it a "Blabs"?

[marajade]

Sure you do... make sure its cleanly punched all the way through.