Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/06/2004 5:12:16 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sub-Driver

Doesn't this mean that any pair that decides to engage in a "life partnership" would qualify. For example, I work for the city and I have a platonic friend that needs insurance. Wouldn't I be able to attain insurance and benefits for my friend under this program? I mean we are life long friends after all.


2 posted on 12/06/2004 5:17:40 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

City of "Brotherly" Love bump.


8 posted on 12/06/2004 5:46:12 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Break those insurance companies so legitimate families can no longer have health insurance
and Hillary care will be baaaack on the street again...

Bring the worst human disease into the hospitals where others can get infected as well....

Sodomites are bio terror incubators ,carriers and inoculators

imo
11 posted on 12/06/2004 6:03:47 PM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
In a victory for gay couples, Pennsylvania's Supreme Court ruled Monday that Philadelphia has a right to give city employees in same-sex "life partnerships" the same type of worker benefits now enjoyed only by married couples.

I have no problem with that as long as, if the "life partner" and the employee ever part ways, the "life partner" gets to keep half of the employee's stuff......And alimony.

12 posted on 12/06/2004 6:08:20 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping - more from Philadelphia, which used to be known as the "city of brotherly love" and is now known as the "city of same sex sodomy".

:-(

There has been lots of nastiness from Philadelphia and the "gay" agenda. This is just more dribbles from the same fetid swamp. Aided and abetted, you'll notice, by leftist judges.

Let me and ItsOurTimeNow know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.


13 posted on 12/06/2004 6:52:54 PM PST by little jeremiah (What would happen if everyone decided their own "right and wrong"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; little jeremiah; Texas_Jarhead; Domestic Church

I have a question. Since my sister is queer, but we have the same set of parents, why is she a minority and I'm not?
Why is it that when I wear my 'Straight Pride' t-shirt, I'm homophobic? But when she wears her 'Gay Pride' t-shirt, she is not heterophobic?

This is a group of people who define themselves by their sexuality and nothing else. Every form I fill out does not include a box for 'Queer'. If it did, would a gay Mexican be more of a minority than a straight one?

I am tired of having the gay agenda shoved down my throat (no pun intended).


15 posted on 12/06/2004 8:31:50 PM PST by 82Marine89 (Illegal used to mean 'against the law'. Now its a voting block.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Okay, okay... before everybody flips out, whenever I hear this "domestic partner" stuff I think of my two maiden aunts who lived together for 40 years before one of them died, and it makes total sense to me for one of them to have been able to use their insurance benefit to pay for the other one... who gives a schumer who it is you're paying for, really.

(However NTS nothing in the preceding should be in anyway construed to in any way imply that fags are not completely revolting miscegenated depraved vile subhuman scum etc. yawn blah bore ad nauseum, of curse...) (or at least the ones on DU are...)


17 posted on 12/06/2004 9:53:24 PM PST by fire_eye (Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"Even with the law, he noted, same-sex couples still wouldn't have the right to file joint tax returns, or avoid testifying against each other in a criminal trial, or automatically receive workers compensation when their partner dies."

Yet.

19 posted on 12/06/2004 10:29:31 PM PST by TAdams8591 (BORK SPECTER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

What about hetersexual live in "life partners" who have a personal objection to marriage, this ruling discriminates against their ability to have marriage-lite.


24 posted on 12/06/2004 10:46:21 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson