Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/06/2004 12:59:55 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
If Abraham Lincoln were president today, CBS and the New York Times might be boarded up, with Michael Moore, Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, and even John Kerry rotting in jail. I'm not saying that would be a good thing.

Well I am!

2 posted on 12/06/2004 1:17:46 AM PST by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

bttt


3 posted on 12/06/2004 1:18:49 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

The likes of Hayden and Kerry ought to be tried for treason.


4 posted on 12/06/2004 1:32:57 AM PST by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

"There was no imminent threat," said Kennedy. "This was made up in Texas, announced in January to the Republican leadership that war was going to take place and was going to be good politically. This whole thing was a fraud."

So Teddy, you're saying 9/11 didn't happen.


8 posted on 12/06/2004 3:12:02 AM PST by MadAnthony1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Tom Hayden... received the Medal of Freedom from Jimmy Carter

barf alert... i didn't know this nugget about jimmuh the red.

10 posted on 12/06/2004 3:29:37 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

SDS scumbag aging hippie alert


11 posted on 12/06/2004 3:34:01 AM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

The main difference between then and now was the official declaration of war. If this president could get Congress to officially declare war against all Islamic states, perhaps we could arrest these clowns.


14 posted on 12/06/2004 3:49:19 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Tommy Hayden is re-visiting the drug induced purple haze of the radical movement. He's trying to relive his "glory days" with Hanoi Jane...good luck numbnuts!


17 posted on 12/06/2004 4:46:45 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hchutch

Hmm. We made need to invoke Rule 7.62 on Mr. Hayden.


18 posted on 12/06/2004 4:52:05 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"people prefer feeling loyalty to humanity as a whole, rather than to obsolete nation-states"

Oh balls. It has nothing to do with "humanity as a whole", it is called partisanship. Hayden Moore et al are simply garden variety communists. Their loyalty is to a political ideology, not "humanity". They are for the defeat of the US because the US is the leading anti-communist force in the world. They can't destroy capitalism while we win.

And this isn't all that new, either. It is simple a modern version of classic religious sectarianism. Groups of people putting loyalty to an unorthodox world view above loyalty to the state in which they reside has been a constant in western civilization since the reformation. The age of religious wars was followed by the age of ideological wars, which we are still in.

19 posted on 12/06/2004 4:58:35 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Hayden is a lib nut. It's good to see his rants all over the net to show real people just how much of a traitor he and Mickey Moore really are. It also might help folks understand the real reason we left Vietnam after all this time.


20 posted on 12/06/2004 5:14:55 AM PST by BillyCrockett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
More and more, people prefer feeling loyalty to humanity as a whole, rather than to obsolete nation-states.

Let's see, leftist Democrats would prefer that more people per day be killed under Saddam than what is now happening in Iraq. Wouldn't that be MORE inhumane? Why then would they advocate such a policy?

Simple, those people getting killed are nameless Arabs, which is prefectly fine with them. They can easily keep it off the airwaves while their friends rake in oil-for-food money, sell illegal weapons, and slowly bring the world into chaos, which suits them just fine. The can then foist global tyranny as the "solution," off which they can feed in perpetuity.

The Slave Party, as vile as ever.

22 posted on 12/06/2004 7:03:46 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are really stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ValerieUSA

No, no. Tom Hayden for the "Democratic" Party nominee in 2008.


27 posted on 12/06/2004 7:52:08 AM PST by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson