Posted on 12/05/2004 2:00:09 PM PST by Coleus
I think the CDC had a sexuality survey that came out in 2000 or 2001 that showed less than 2% were homosexual.
Strangely, this was apparently the first major survey since Kinsey's flawed reports. Everyone just took his figures and accepted them at face value.
Something like the figure of 10,000,000 homeless that a social services worker and homeless advocate in Washington D.C. named Mitch somethingorother later admitted he simply pulled out of a hat to dramatize the problem. Soon it became received wisdom and was quoted worldwide.
exactly,Lady, exactly.....
the rectum was not meant to be used in such a fashion,as a lifestyle, repeatedly.....
its the sex act itself that homosexuals practice that makes them disease prone.....
a word about "cocktails".....there is some question now whether they really work as well as they hoped, so if I were a practicing homosexual , I wouldn't be counting on that.....
Your correct, and I laugh at those who say nobody has any business deciding on what goes on in peoples bedrooms.
"AIDS rate for homosexuals climbs; data called 'astonishing'"
I am not "astonished."
That's a fact.
The issue goes beyond money for a cure. I found this trend to be outrageous. Lately, you can read talk in the gay community about strategies for getting insurance coverage for plastic surgery procedures to conteract the effects of protease inhibitor drugs. The effects, termed lipodystrophies, cause accumulations of fat around the shoulders (buffalo hump), abdominal area (protease paunch) and fat loss and redistribution from the face resulting in wrinkles and tell-tale hollow cheeks. They have lobbied mightily to get tumscent liposuction, Retylane "cheek-filler" injections, and hormones reclassified from elective (they pay) to necessary (you and I pay). None of these expensive procedures are necessary for health, its just that its really hard to successfully cruise for sex in parks and the baths with a hollow gaunt face and Quasimodo hump. So lets all cut funding for childhood cancer and diabetes research and be inclusive and tolerant for the plight of gay dance club wallflowers everywhere.
With so much talk of AIDS infection being a "badge of honor" among gays, the hunchback, paunch and corpse-like face should really turn 'em on, shouldn't it?
If AIDS were caused by a virus that could be passed by sexual intercourse then it would spread like wildfire in the heterosexual community. The simple fact that it hasn't and won't has nothing to do with the good practices of heterosexuals and everything to do with the fact that HIV is not the cause of AIDS.
This has been obvious since at least the late 80's. I am amazed that the HIV=AIDS fiction has any legs left.
Agreed...one must consider the types of sex involved, screen out the more risky behavior/practices, one should just hope to be spongeworthy.
Do a google search on "bug chasing."
BTTT
It means he can't decide which team to play for.
This has been obvious since at least the late 80's. I am amazed that the HIV=AIDS fiction has any legs left. >>
Then what causes AIDS?
http://www.mercola.com/2001/sep/5/hiv_aids.htm
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/Spectrum/creating_immunity_to_hivaids.htm
But they tell me it's a disease that is now primarily spreading in the hetero population.
Remember all that garbage from the media and the gay groups? All intended to portray the "We are not the cause" or "Our activities are normal, after all it's just an alternative lifestyle" agenda.
Red6
The original advocate of the HIV does not cause AIDS theory is certainly Dr. Peter Duesberg. His books and papers would persuade anyone who is rational and takes the time to actually read him with an open mind. It is nice to see that there are others willing to fight the political correct HIV=AIDS crowd and tell the truth about AIDS.
Here is a link to an early Duesberg paper:
We are spending more money to find a cure for this PREVENTABLE disease than we are on cancer and heart diseases.
An excerpt from 'The Homosexual Lifestyle is Costing You Plenty!'
The 1998 Federal Budget includes $4.746 billion for AIDS funding. That is a $465 million increase over the 1997 Budget. That is more funding than all forms of cancer combined!
Federal Money (your money) Spent per Death:
AIDS/HIV: $39,172 Diabetes: $5,449 Heart Disease: $1,056 Stroke: $765
Protesters back Milford teen who was rejected as blood donor
So much for the freedom loving, smaller-less intrusive government conservatives, huh? By the way, I want a detailed report on what went on in your bedroom last night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.