Posted on 12/04/2004 12:05:54 PM PST by yonif
PATERSON, N.J. -- Six teens who were part of a mob who beat to death a homeless man three years ago were sentenced to prison for their part in the "wilding" rampage.
The six Paterson youths were sentenced Friday for being part of the crowd of 16 youths charged in the killing of Hector Robles in June 2001.
(Excerpt) Read more at nynewsday.com ...
Did you point out to your fellow jurors that if had been one of their relatives --- or for that matter, any relative of any middle class person --- who had been savagely beaten to death for no reason, this would have been a death penalty case? But because the man was homeless, it was basically a misdemeanor case? Did you point out to your fellow jurors what that means to society if it's ok to kill a person just because he's homeless? Did they take the time to think about that at all? Or were they just anxious to get home to their homes and families, leaving the murder victim to rot?
Just curious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.