Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fun With Tanks
DodgeRam.info ^ | agitator

Posted on 12/04/2004 9:55:23 AM PST by agitator



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: agitator

Used to own one of those soft bodies. They just don't hold up.


21 posted on 12/04/2004 10:24:07 AM PST by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but have recently come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
I agree, looks like a T-72.

I think it's the T-72 Convertable model

22 posted on 12/04/2004 10:25:49 AM PST by gortklattu (check out thotline dot com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Picture properties states (http://dodgeram.info/gallery/iraq/iraqi_tank-r.jpg)


23 posted on 12/04/2004 10:28:21 AM PST by Dust in the Wind (I've got peace like a river . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: agitator

The sign said, "NO PARKING". What part of "NO PARKING" didn't they understand?


24 posted on 12/04/2004 10:31:54 AM PST by Mike-o-Matic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

"Eat. Spit. Be Happy." (off the bag)

Isn't that the second line of Conan's warrior philosophy!
(LOL!)


25 posted on 12/04/2004 10:36:01 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

"I think it's the T-72 Convertable model"

Who says you can't get these babies with air-conditioning!?


26 posted on 12/04/2004 10:37:00 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Even the Abrams that have been disabled have not had the turrent knocked off. But that would appear to be the work of an Abrams - looks like a T-55 based upon tread height.


27 posted on 12/04/2004 10:39:40 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ ("Sure is a nice day for making things right." Boss Spearman. NSDQ, De Opresso Libre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Looks like a Soviet built T-72. The Old Iraqi regime bought alot of these. As you can tell they didn't hold up too well against our Bradly's armed with TOW missiles or our M-1 Main Battle tanks.


28 posted on 12/04/2004 10:40:04 AM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
A 1989 Caprice...

Check window shapes, door handles, and the trim on the fender aft of the wheel well.

I had the additional prior knowledge that it was a popular car in the area during our first adventure, in which I was privileged to participate.

29 posted on 12/04/2004 10:41:56 AM PST by ExGeeEye (What do batteries run on?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: agitator

BTTT


30 posted on 12/04/2004 10:44:21 AM PST by spodefly (I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Very agressive looking RV's, I would say...
Fine lines and all wheel drive too.. a spartan kitchen
and utilitarian bathrooms but, hey, you can't have everything..
and that big ol' long canned chili warmer looks state of the art..
31 posted on 12/04/2004 10:54:28 AM PST by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye
it was a popular car in the area during our first adventure

Yeah, I read somewhere that it was popular due to its great A/C.

32 posted on 12/04/2004 11:02:52 AM PST by martin_fierro (brrrrrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu
>>>I think it's the T-72 Convertable model <<<...with the top down.
33 posted on 12/04/2004 11:19:06 AM PST by HardStarboard (Surrounded by Kerry/Edwards Signs in Washington State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

Well, if it's a Chevy, it's powered by a ford Flathead.

34 posted on 12/04/2004 11:23:07 AM PST by gortklattu (check out thotline dot com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jakkknife

Wouldn't the guy in the top photo be the loader?


35 posted on 12/04/2004 11:34:37 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Puts me mind of a T-72.


36 posted on 12/04/2004 11:35:14 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE

Hull looks like a newer version.


37 posted on 12/04/2004 11:36:04 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: brooklin
" Wouldn't the guy in the top photo be the loader?"

Probably. I don't profess to know what each crewmember's title and job is. It's actually something I should read about and learn.

38 posted on 12/04/2004 11:51:41 AM PST by Jackknife (.......Land of the Free,because of the Brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

Check out the rims .... chrome specials. Anyone identify?


39 posted on 12/04/2004 12:39:55 PM PST by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Soviet T-62.

They're crap.

40 posted on 12/04/2004 12:43:27 PM PST by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson