Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A threat to vaporize 100 Muslim cities
WorldNetDaily ^ | 12-03-04 | David C. Atkins

Posted on 12/03/2004 11:00:39 PM PST by ChristianDefender

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 841-850 next last
To: Kornev

get the **** out? And what aobuthte fact that the cult is spreading in the US and the west as well?


401 posted on 12/04/2004 3:32:05 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Malaysia's population is only 23 million as per the CIA factbook.


402 posted on 12/04/2004 3:33:09 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
I'm wondering, how long did islam take to overtake these asian countries.. Europe is a void of spiritualism now, and it probably going to get swallowed up in a generation or 2 with islam.

Very scary.
403 posted on 12/04/2004 3:34:13 AM PST by Kornev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Well, what I've heard is that the majority of islamics on the world are now asian. Right now I can't remember the breakdowns of the populations.

UPDATE:
238 million in Indonesia (88% Muslim)
160 million Pakistan       (95% Muslim)
140 million Muslims in India
23 million Malaysia        (75% Muslim is my guess)
404 posted on 12/04/2004 3:36:27 AM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Kornev
Get the hell out! Like I said, I would not take any amount of salary to live in an islamic nation for even a day.

Last I hear, there were around 10,000 Americans here in Malaysia and several hundred American and multi-national corporations.

The expatriates for the most part live in their own areas which is not so bad. Much of the community becomes quite close knitted.

405 posted on 12/04/2004 3:36:39 AM PST by expatguy (Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender
who says this isn't already the case?

The muslims in this country are very stupid..... all they need to do is read a little history and see what we did to the Japanese after they bombed Pearl Harbor. We took their homes, businesses, and locked them(including) children in camps. This wasn't "ancient" history... this was 60 years ago. Recent enough for people to remember.

When the US gets p@ssed, we kick your a@#. If a nuclear "dirty" bomb or a series of suicied bombers in malls were to occur, we would have to live with the consequences of the "Patriot Act". Some of which is kinda scary. Especially the parts of the act that pertain to searches and detention for suspicion of "terrorist" activities.

406 posted on 12/04/2004 3:37:19 AM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Malaysia's population is only 23 million as per the CIA factbook......

Seen my #404 post for much better numbers.


407 posted on 12/04/2004 3:37:33 AM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

I hope you'll be ok, but I am glad I don't have to live in that situation.


408 posted on 12/04/2004 3:38:42 AM PST by Kornev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

Comment #409 Removed by Moderator

To: Kornev
I think you're wrong, they (Malaysian Indonesian Muslims) are quite serious submitters.

They look like it from yahoo photos of their rallies and detonations. But how often do you read about an Indonesian or Malaysian who has joined the armed Jihad in Iraq, Afghanistan? Been captured as an enemy combatant? Islam was born in a dry dust strewn locale and does best in the arid moonscapes of this planet.

410 posted on 12/04/2004 3:42:34 AM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: antrix

CIA FACT BOOK has 160 million in Pakistan. This does not include Bangladesh which broke away from Pakistan a few decades back.


411 posted on 12/04/2004 3:44:32 AM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: hleewilder
I'm sorry, but that's way over the line.

I don't think it goes far enough.

412 posted on 12/04/2004 3:45:27 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antrix
Pakiland is not 170 million only 100 million less than india.
Hey this mean India gets nuked?? Cos i m from India & i m not a slammie for god sake!!

India will not get nuked. Just tell your Muzzies they will be submitting to Lord Krishna from here on in and prostrating in the direction of his birth place.

413 posted on 12/04/2004 3:47:09 AM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; expatguy
Malaysia:
Population 23,522,482
GRoups: Malay and other indigenous 58%, Chinese 24%, Indian 8%, others 10% (2000)

Most Muslimes are Malays -- so the % is about 65% I'd venture

Pakistan 160 million, 97% Muslimes

Indonesia 240 million, 88% Muslime

India 1.1 billion, 11% Muslime

Russia 150 million, 15% Muslime
414 posted on 12/04/2004 3:47:20 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: antrix

Nope, India is our ally in this war onISlam. WE nuke Mecca and everyone's problems are solved


415 posted on 12/04/2004 3:48:26 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: Cronos


India 1.1 billion, 11% Muslime......


That should be 14% by now. I heard Hindu nationalists using that percent and complaining about Muzzy birthrates, how Muzzies were 3% at time of partition.


416 posted on 12/04/2004 3:50:25 AM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

ALSO.... Bangladesh which has a 140 million with 83% being Muzzy


417 posted on 12/04/2004 3:52:33 AM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

Comment #418 Removed by Moderator

To: ChristianDefender
To be a deterrent, your threat has to be understood and the enemy has to believe you actually would do it.

These Muslim countries have societies submerged in ignorance and based upon lies as a way of life. The people are terribly ill-informed. A nuclear threat would not be understood or believed by those fanatics you want to deter.

419 posted on 12/04/2004 3:57:17 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

"MAD worked in part during the Cold War because both sides had thousands of nukes, so could reasonably worry that if they didn't respond massively and instantly, they might never respond at all ..."

Wrong. The central idea behind sea-launched (SLBM) and mobile missiles is to eliminate this 'use it or lose it' arguement. Our side decided to use SLBM's, and these were a were a stabilizing influence in the cold war. MAD is a concept that refers to the overall quantity of warheads that each side built; you are conflating these two concepts.

"The terrorists present no such threat to us. They might could take out a big chunk of a couple of cities. The existence of the United States would not be seriously at risk."

Wrong. A dozen sleeper nukes in major US cities will put everything at risk; I can't imagine everyone carrying on with their lives as usual, knowing that these blackmail warheads could be in their city.

"The only serious threat that the initiator of a massive nuclear strike had was from an immediate and massive retaliation."

Partial Credit. The perp of any nuclear strike (not just a massive one) faced an overwhelming US response.

"We can take out the Islamic nations with far less loss of life, so we would."

Details, please.

"Not right. Immoral. Plain and simple."

Wrong. Massive retaliation is absolutely right and the only moral decision. Anything less would constitute surrender. Either way, our cities will be hit, but the enemy must be vaporized. We will rebuild, they must never be allowed to do so.


420 posted on 12/04/2004 3:59:00 AM PST by IndyMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 841-850 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson