Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Right Does The Media Have To Defend An Enemy Killing Our Troops?
Dec 3, 2004 | TC

Posted on 12/03/2004 1:30:41 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

The liberal spin machine insists on supporting terrorist countries, the U.N., and terrorists, all of whom are involved in some way in efforts against America.

Just over three years ago they succeeded in attacking New York, murdering some 3,000 people, and creating family as well as economic destruction.

Carefully planned military intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq revealed melanomas which have been removed before the disease spread. We now remain there to both assure the cure and teach them to live healthy lives.

Even so, our liberal spin machine remains on the sidelines rooting for the disease, no mention of the sacrifice endured by our soldiers in conquering it, the media remains nauseated at the notion.

How is the liberal spin machine protected under the Constitution’s definition of treason?

Why does America accept their perspective?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: amendment1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2004 1:30:41 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
How is the liberal spin machine protected under the Constitution’s definition of treason? Why does America accept their perspective?

No one's willing to stand up for right for fear of being sued into homelessness. Thank the ACLU and the Democrats. They made treason fashionable in the '60s. Now they're making it mandatory in the 21st century.

2 posted on 12/03/2004 1:32:54 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Carefully planned - military intervention - Iraq

Who are you trying to kid?


3 posted on 12/03/2004 1:34:29 PM PST by valence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Their spin is unstable. They are already precessing in excess of known tolerances. They are breaking up...
(no need for treason stuff, they lose by betting against the American people. Dissolution is certain.
4 posted on 12/03/2004 1:35:06 PM PST by Edgerunner (The left ain't right. Hand me that launch pickle...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

They treat President Bush with the same disrespect and disdain - the master Surgeon (or Oncologist, to more closely match your analogy) who is working vigilantly to remove the Islamofascist Wahabbist cancer from the Middle East.


5 posted on 12/03/2004 1:37:00 PM PST by PowerPro (DOUBLE W - He's STILL the one. Now don't that feel GOOD????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I have always wondered why the MSM is so openly at war with our country.


6 posted on 12/03/2004 1:38:38 PM PST by Pylot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

"What Right Does The Media Have To Defend An Enemy Killing Our Troops?"

They can get away with it because alot of Americans like to see our soldiers getting killed and support those who do it. Whether it's disguised as environmentalism, diversity, gay rights, animal rights or women's rights, it all boils down to hatred of America and the values that represent America.


7 posted on 12/03/2004 1:41:07 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
crefully planned military intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq revealed melanomas which have been removed before the disease spread.

What 'carefully planned' intervention in Iraq? If that clown Rumsfeld was involved, it's a practical lock that things will go south on day 3.

Of course, he'll never notice, what with all the roses on the streets of Iraq's cities.

8 posted on 12/03/2004 1:41:24 PM PST by Pahuanui (When a foolish man hears of the Tao, he laughs out loud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valence

let me guess.. you think George Bush and Gen Myers had "No Plan To Win The Peace"?

begone


9 posted on 12/03/2004 1:41:54 PM PST by sdpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: valence

Having fun flying under the radar?


10 posted on 12/03/2004 1:43:22 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (I'm here because I'm not all there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: valence

If there is an explanation for your post other than the obvious one, could you be kind enough to give it?


11 posted on 12/03/2004 1:43:27 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: valence
No one. The campaign was planned and exceeded it's parameters in time and effect.

The time after could not be planed as no campaign survives first contact with the enemy.

This is not a new doctrine, and ignoring it would have meant that we failed in WWII, since we didn't plan the aftermath, but fought anyway.

We ran a "Thunder Run through Iraq, and ended the Iraqi army in weeks, including the overrunning of Baghdad, which all the pundits said would be our "Stalingrad."

It was very carefully planned. The time after? Not at all, but that's the way that it is in war.
12 posted on 12/03/2004 1:43:52 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

it becomes more obvious every day TC... as you see, there is even a percentage here who have bought into the "quagmire" etc media lies.. so, no dang wonder the socialists eat it up..


13 posted on 12/03/2004 1:45:58 PM PST by sdpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valence
Carefully planned - military intervention - Iraq
Who are you trying to kid?

Really?

Why do you believe the liberal spin machine was so upset that the Pentagon duped them?

14 posted on 12/03/2004 1:48:14 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection (www.whatyoucrave.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

"Welcome to facts.........."


15 posted on 12/03/2004 1:49:42 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection (www.whatyoucrave.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Stealth troll... a reply here, a reply there, pretty soon ZOT!


16 posted on 12/03/2004 1:50:55 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (I'm here because I'm not all there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

no, no. no bill.. that will never do... some have to see a written blue print on "how to win the peace" and other such bs. no doubt military stratigists and tacticians every one... much like .. skerry.. and his super General Lessy Clark..


17 posted on 12/03/2004 1:51:05 PM PST by sdpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: valence

"Carefully planned - military intervention - Iraq

Who are you trying to kid?"


I was thinking the same thing.


18 posted on 12/03/2004 1:51:27 PM PST by Blzbba (Conservative Republican - Less gov't, less spending, less intrusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Is that a "fact"?


19 posted on 12/03/2004 1:51:55 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection (www.whatyoucrave.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I think the question is automaticly get simplified and therefore distorted.

The world is is largely ignorant and unable to understand complicated problems. And the media make its living mainly from these people.

I see the thing (understand by the mob) this way:

Is that OK for an american soldier to shot dead an injured person lying on the floor?

Answer 1.)  No, it is not. (The soldier involved will be investigated and prosecuted according the law.)

Answer 2.) Yes, it is. ( We are americans and we do as we please, and if you do not like it come and stop us)

Answer .3) Well... Actually... the question is not that simple....... We do not know the status of the injured person....... ............ ......... He might just "pretend" to be dead....... ...... ............ .......... .......... ..........     And the soldiers are not there...... ......... ......... ........ ........ ...... ........ ........ ..... ..... to do health check on every..... ...... ......... ....... ....... ...... ........ ......... ....... ...... ......... ......... ...... ....... ....... body they find in the war zone..... .................... ................................ ........... ...... .......... ...... ........ ..... He may.... ....... ....... ...... ...... ....... ..... ........ ....... ...... ........ ......... ....... ........ ......... ..... .....had a weapon...... ....... ......... .......... ......... ...... .......... ..... ........ ...... ....... ...... .. ....... .... ...... ..... .....or a ..... ........ ........ ...... ........ .... ......... ......bomb...... .....or..... ....... ....... ...hrrr.. ....zzzz....hrrr .....zzzz....     hrrrr.. .... zzzzzz

So in reality, most of the people need to choose from the first two options....

Maybe this explain (not excuse) for many reactions to this issue.

 

20 posted on 12/03/2004 1:54:16 PM PST by pocketdictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson