How can we win a war on terror when this trial and execution has been so delayed?
To: JesseHousman
But the judge excluded statements Akbar made to two sergeants who guarded him after the attack, saying Akbar had not yet been informed of his legal rightsRidiculous.
2 posted on
12/03/2004 10:53:21 AM PST by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: JesseHousman
He needs to suffer one of those unfortunate jail house accidents. Then who needs a trial.
To: JesseHousman
And WHY is this sorry excuse for a "soldier" not doing his time at Guantanamo with all the other jihadist terrorist scum?
4 posted on
12/03/2004 11:01:48 AM PST by
RockAgainsttheLeft04
(PUNY FREEPERS: I am the Moderator-- bow down before me and await my orders...)
To: JesseHousman
Just shoot him and be done with it.
To: JesseHousman
It really is enraging me the way we these terrorists are still alive and these traitors and murderers amongst us are allowed to go on like this. What are terrorists to fear? There's no consequence or suffering. They don't even seem to have to fear the death penalty.
To: JesseHousman
How can we win a war on terror when this trial and execution has been so delayed?Since this didn't happen on a battlefield, his court martial had to take place back in the States. He's a US soldier and will be treated as such despite what he did. Then he gets shot.
To: JesseHousman
It's too bad the military doesn't use hanging or firing squads anymore.
14 posted on
12/03/2004 7:51:09 PM PST by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson