Exactly, and that's why Rove has expressly forbidden the good congressman from ever "darkening the halls of the White House again." A Rep demanding that we actually take effective action to prevent terrorists and other law-breakers from entering the country is evidently unacceptable to this White House.
I talked directly (face-to-face) with one of Tancredo's aides. She confirmed that Rove had indeed told him not to darken the halls of the White House
Exactly, and that's why Rove has expressly forbidden the good congressman from ever "darkening the halls of the White House again."
>>>
A Rep demanding that we actually take effective action to prevent terrorists and other law-breakers from entering the country is evidently unacceptable to this White House.
<<<
That stance by the Administration causes me to hit the reset button.
It's time now to get a handle on a Mexican POTUS out of control
But, after all, why work for $.13/hour in Nicaragua's interior when you can work for $.50/hour in Mexico's interior - DOH! - you can get FIVE DOLLARS us in the AMERICAN INTERIOR!
I guess we can all choose which laws we can abide in.
Illegal invaders, willing to play 2nd class non-citizens with criminal access to our country are treated BETTER than Americans that love AMERICA!
Freaking ridiculous that we are even having this debate.
Slam the borders, force Mexico to enforce their border with us by all means necessary, secure the ports and have REAL Homeland Security...
Amen, Moj...
And here's Tancredo's taken to task for reprimanding the WH for its own incompetence and BS-policies??
The arrogance of the Bush Administration is breathtakingly Clintonesque.
FACT: This White House supports a subversive modus operandi on the subjects of border "enforcement" and illegal immigration -- but why ONLY on the West coast, and with primarily Mexicans exempt from ANY U.S. immigration law?