Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

School Bus Driver Fired for Stem Cell Talk
Associated Press ^ | 12/2/04

Posted on 12/02/2004 3:56:16 PM PST by reportgirl73

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 621 next last
To: AndyTheBear
Amen!

And God Bless you too!

In humble service to His Majesty the King,
Julianne

481 posted on 12/04/2004 9:19:08 PM PST by The Mayor (If Jesus lives within us, sin need not overwhelm us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: Dianna; AndyTheBear; The Mayor
"When 50% of the people in the United States disagree with a certain position, maybe you ought to refrain from discussing it with their children."

First, it wasn't a position, but an immutable truth that is not in dispute. Embryonic cells have never provided any cures, or even hope for cures; they cause fast growing cancers in most cases.

Second, close to 68% of the American public voices opposition to use of embryos in any research. You are pulling a Dan Rather here.

Third, when you send your children to government schools, you have relinquished all control over what they hear and what they are taught. In many states you have even relinquished control over their medical treatment. No responsible parent sends their children to government schools at this point in time.

482 posted on 12/04/2004 9:40:30 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
"EVERYONE thinks that they are right."

But we ARE right, that's the difference.

"Even liberals have articles and studies that they can point to to "prove" their positions. Arguing the point that we discuss "fact" and they lie is ludicrous. They will never believe our facts because they don't want to!"

The FACT that they don't want to believe our FACTS, doesn't change the FACT that our FACTS are FACTS.

483 posted on 12/04/2004 10:33:05 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor

Thank you the Mayor and most of all Mrs.Mayor..


484 posted on 12/04/2004 10:38:46 PM PST by fatima (Pray for our troops.I voted for tomkow6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
"I'm ok with it. The reason is that I think she broached the subject deliberately to cause trouble and make noise. She was practically daring the parents to complain so she could then cry, "woe is me! The LIBS get away with it!"

Your okay with the firing? She wasn't deliberately trying to cause trouble, she was trying to disseminate ACCURATE and TRUTHFUL information. But you've warped and twisted her motives and actions as well as any leftist would. YOU are guilty of doing the same kind of thing they do to conservatives, you hypocrite.

"Frankly, the liberal teachers I've encountered are so involved in their own world view that they cannot even comprehend WHAT we are so angry about. They don't realize how much of what they say is liberal crap and that there IS another side. I lost a long time teacher friend right before the election by trying to explain to her how biased her teaching is. She NEVER got it and was determined to believe that I was just suddenly a mean and awful person (after 10 years)."

Firing that type of person is probably ineffective. She wouldn't have gotten it, the teachers left behind probably wouldn't get it and thus change their behavior. I wouldn't cry if they all got fired though."

So we should fire conservatives because that would be effective but we shouldn't fire liberals because that would be ineffective? Yeah, sure, that makes a lot of sense.

Both sides should be treated equally regarding these issues. FIRE a few Liberals and they will begin to get it. The teachers who take their place will tread more lightly. We have to complain, organize, protest and use whatever legitimate avenue it takes to stop them from indoctrinating children.

As I said on a previous post to you, I grow weary of conservatives (and that means YOU) who are harder on their own than on the enemy. We get enough of that from liberals (who are harder on us than they are their own). Thank you for well proving my point.

485 posted on 12/04/2004 10:53:03 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
"She was never warned, she asked was was approriate and never got an answer."

I believe you mayor. I asked you about the above in post #130 on 12/2. Your wife answered in post #131 and #132 also on 12/2 stating that she asked what was appropriate and never got an answer. The article posted by general_re was written on 12/4. My questions and your wife's answer came 2 days before the article.

The press spins, lies and often gets facts wrong. I know that well from personal experience. AND it's difficult to imagine just how poor they are, unless it happens to you.

Yes, the school adminstrators are lying to cover their butts, especially since they know you are talking to lawyers. I've experienced that also.

486 posted on 12/04/2004 11:30:16 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: general_re

Do you believe the press and the school administrators, or do you believe Mr. & Mrs. Mayor?


487 posted on 12/04/2004 11:33:10 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: reportgirl73
But Superintendent Thomas Ramming said employees are not allowed to have such conversations with students.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

can you keep us updated on the status of the lawsuit and if possible get a lawyer that wont settle out of court :-)

488 posted on 12/04/2004 11:46:35 PM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH

I'm content to let the facts reveal themselves in due time.


489 posted on 12/05/2004 12:04:53 AM PST by general_re ("What's plausible to you is unimportant." - D'man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: OwnershipSociety

"It doesn't matter. Using the children, who are captive on the bus, for an "educational" lesson is unacceptable. No matter how worthy the info or the motivations of the so called "teacher" may be"


I believe you and I agree on more than you'll admit.

For instance:

The very first time I ever heard about sex was on the school bus. I even remember the name of the kid who told me. We were five years old. What Paul told me was so graphic that I can't go into it here.

We hear in the news on a regular basis about kids having sex at younger and younger ages.

I'm certain you agree with me that this is a bad thing.

Now if I were a bus driver and I heard the kids discussing what I heard at five years of age, I as a bus driver would speak out against it with all my might.
It could save someone from a lifetime of pain.

If I get in trouble for it, oh well.

Matthew 19:14
Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these."

Now you judge for yourself, who should I obey. You? Or God?

Now that scenario was just over children having sex, murder for research is even worse.

Now I hear what you're saying about wanting to be in control of your kids education, and not wanting them indoctrinated. This is a noble sentiment that I understand full well. My kids are ages 8, 10, and 12.

I also know what I was indoctrinated with on the bus at age 5.

I cannot disagree more that sitting there and saying nothing is the right thing to do.

I would encourage you to have the courage to do the right thing, and stand up for what is good, and speak out against evil when the time comes.


490 posted on 12/05/2004 12:35:52 AM PST by Manic_Episode (OUT OF ORDER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH
Your okay with the firing? She wasn't deliberately trying to cause trouble, she was trying to disseminate ACCURATE and TRUTHFUL information. But you've warped and twisted her motives and actions as well as any leftist would. YOU are guilty of doing the same kind of thing they do to conservatives, you hypocrite.

BS! We just had a friggin election and national debate upon stem cell issues. She had to know it was a controversial issue. So, we have two choices. We can believe she knew she would cause trouble or we can believe that she's a moron who somehow missed that issue being discussed over the last year.

So we should fire conservatives because that would be effective but we shouldn't fire liberals because that would be ineffective? Yeah, sure, that makes a lot of sense.

It makes a lot of sense if you can comprehend the written word. I said that people who DELIBERATELY use these issues to persuade children should be fired. Many liberals do this and I acknowledged that. Many liberals also do it unconsciously. Punishing someone for something they don't even realize they are doing is ineffective as a deterrent. However, I even stated that it wouldn't bother me if they were fired anyway.

FIRE a few Liberals and they will begin to get it. The teachers who take their place will tread more lightly.

No, they won't. I've already explained why. We've protested aganist liberal media for years. Do they get it yet?

As I said on a previous post to you, I grow weary of conservatives (and that means YOU) who are harder on their own than on the enemy.

Yup! Absolutely! I have standards. I expect liberals to be hypocritical idiots. I expect conservatives to be better than that. Sorry if you can't measure up.

491 posted on 12/05/2004 1:37:01 AM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH
But we ARE right, that's the difference.

Will you stop your self-righteous foot stomping for just a moment and try to grasp the following FACT?

It doesn't matter if what she said was true. It is irrelevant. As you have been told numerous times, there are many facts in the universe that parents do not wish their children to know until they decide their children are ready to know them.

**I get to make that decision because I am the parent. I know my children better than any person they have ever encountered driving a school bus. Her job is to transport children to and from school. It is not her job to discuss with children issues that parents would rather their children not know about. Do you get it yet?

492 posted on 12/05/2004 1:58:45 AM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: visualops
lol, I'm not arguing. Please go back and read the post I originally responded to. I do not like intellectual dishonesty, and can't stand a false argument. The poster I responded to basically said a bunch of nonsense. Yours and the other response to me did not take what I said in context, hence the lack of understanding.

My first encounter with you was in post #348, where you said you didn't think I'd read the article.

I read the article. I agree that Mrs. Thompson's actions don't constitute "a firing offense" but I also don't think that the discussion was appropriate with small children.

I'm not sure where you think I showed intellectual dishonesty or a false argument but you're welcome to point it out.

493 posted on 12/05/2004 3:28:24 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
That's just the question I've been asking, but have yet to receive an answer to: What exactly is inappropriate about sharing the facts, about this particular subject, with students?

It's impossible to explain the difference between adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells without getting into issues of conception and abortion.

These issues are best left for parents to explain to small children, at a time and in a way the parents feel is appropriate for the child's age and maturity level.

Some of the older children on the bus may have been aware of these issues. Some of the younger ones probably were not.

I can't tell if you are being disingenuous when you claim not to know why this discussion was inappropriate. If you truly can't figure this out for yourself, I'm not sure you really should be in charge of small children anyway.

494 posted on 12/05/2004 3:38:50 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
:::sigh:::
It's no small miracle the human race is able to communicate at all lol
Your response my post #348 included a comment about other belief systems and proselytizing. My response to that was to disagree (with that particular comment) and reiterate what I originally said about bus drivers. A small but not irrelevant item- I don't think it's inappropriate to discuss embryonic stem cell research to elementary school kids, I said I felt it was beyond the understanding of most. By 8 or 10 they certainly should be able to grasp some basic facts.
Anyway, to get back to it- my statement about intellectual dishonesty was referring to #356. I'm sorry if you misunderstood. At that point I was getting rather annoyed with the whole thread.
There was a time, and still is fortunately in some rare communities, where the adults imparted knowledge to the children of the community. Nowadays, God forbid anyone should say anything to anyone for fear of PC police or what have you. It is beyond absurd. What's rather telling in this case, is that Mrs. Mayor said she'd made a habit of passing on "factoids" to the kids. In 2 1/2 years of driving the bus, only now was there a problem with that.
495 posted on 12/05/2004 6:17:36 AM PST by visualops (It's easier to build a child than repair an adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: visualops
A small but not irrelevant item- I don't think it's inappropriate to discuss embryonic stem cell research to elementary school kids, I said I felt it was beyond the understanding of most. By 8 or 10 they certainly should be able to grasp some basic facts.

Well, that's what I said - they wouldn't understand it without including some information best imparted by parents.

Anyway, to get back to it- my statement about intellectual dishonesty was referring to #356. I'm sorry if you misunderstood.

That could be because you didn't address your comment to the author of #356?

There was a time, and still is fortunately in some rare communities, where the adults imparted knowledge to the children of the community. Nowadays, God forbid anyone should say anything to anyone for fear of PC police or what have you.

As a teacher, I certainly have no objection to adults imparting knowledge, with 2 caveats:

1. The knowledge imparted should be age-appropriate, and

2. The knowledge imparted should be consistent with prevailing community standards.*

*This includes both "liberal" and "conservative" information.

496 posted on 12/05/2004 6:42:56 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

"She had to know it was a controversial issue."

Unlike you, Mrs. Mayor does not let the leftist establishment set the rules for debate and allow them to define what or what is not controversial.

Stem cell research is controversial only in the flawed and disturbed minds of those who who would exploit the most vulnerable for their sick ends.

Thanks for your bravery Mrs. Mayor


497 posted on 12/05/2004 7:11:14 AM PST by eleni121 (NO more reaching out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
"So, we have two choices. We can believe she knew she would cause trouble or we can believe that she's a moron who somehow missed that issue being discussed over the last year."

Sometimes there are situations where possible motivations are limited to two choices, this isn't one of them. Mrs. Mayor was enthusiastic about the information she learned while listening to Mel Gibson (I also heard that interview) and wanted to disseminate the information. I think it is clear from her posts. Not only are you accusing her of trying to cause trouble, but you are also calling her AND HER HUSBAND a liar, tactics so typical of the left when they are dealing with conservatives. YOU are THE hypocrite.

"It makes a lot of sense if you can comprehend the written word. I said that people who DELIBERATELY use these issues to persuade children should be fired. Many liberals do this and I acknowledged that. Many liberals also do it unconsciously. Punishing someone for something they don't even realize they are doing is ineffective as a deterrent."

Sorry, your thinking about the above issue is disordered and your comments about that make NO rational sense. If someone is doing something UNCONSCIOUSLY, and they are then penalized for that behavior, they will become conscious of it REAL fast. As a society we GENERALLY don't choose to punish people or not based on whether or not they are conscious of their actions. And how are we to accurately determine if liberals are doing it consciously or unconsciously? Either everyone gets reprimanded or penalized for indoctrinating our children or no one does.

The old media, who had ALL the power, was rarely if ever held accountable for their transgressions, one reason they never got it. Fire liberals for indoctrinating our children and hit them in the pocketbook where it hurts and they will begin to get it.

"Yup! Absolutely! I have standards. I expect liberals to be hypocritical idiots. I expect conservatives to be better than that. Sorry if you can't measure up"

No, actually you don't expect liberals to live up to any standards but you expect conservatives to live up to the highest of standards, another liberal tactic.

What Mrs. Mayor did does not even closely approximate the effects of liberal teachers in the classroom, who day in and day out, year after year, are instructing children in a captive environment, and blackmail them with grades. The children on that bus were not obligated to listen to Mrs. Mayor and she had no authority to require that they listen, neither could she hold grades over their heads. They could have talked to one another, read, played games and probably many of them were doing just that. No indoctrination there. But you would have HER FIRED and not the liberal who does far worse, day after day, year after year. No, I don't go for THAT kind of double standard well established by liberals for conservatives long ago and neither should you, hypocrite.

And BTW, liberals should be held to the same high standards that conservatives are held to whether you expect them to fail or not. Just as minorities shouldn't get a pass because they are part of a minority group, liberals shouldn't get a pass because they are liberals. I have never given them such a pass. YOU apparently do.

498 posted on 12/05/2004 9:15:33 AM PST by TOUGH STOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Dianna; The Mayor
But that's not really important, is it? Ooohh, you might be interviewed on the NEWS! You might get some attention for yourself!

Yup...educating children. Sure, you were.

Exodus 20:16 "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor."

Just a FRiendly reminder. ;-P

499 posted on 12/05/2004 9:55:42 AM PST by Kudsman (Awwww. The left is feeling, left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman
The assumptions that there is an alterer motive makes me crazy.

Thank you for the link!
500 posted on 12/05/2004 10:01:14 AM PST by The Mayor (If Jesus lives within us, sin need not overwhelm us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 621 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson