Lawrence Auster is probably the best theoretician in the anti-mass immigration camp. His problem is that he is too good, far too intellectual for many to plow through - not a quick read at lunchtime. But for the willing, what he normally does is to encapsulate brilliantly the heart of the argument.
I've been thinking hard on this very subject. Should I, as a Christian, simply sit back and let it all be done to us? My answer is no, it shouldn't, for many of the same reasons that Auster has given here. And I will add another reason:
The mass immigration from Latin America and to some extent the Far East is not a benign one. It is, in fact, the plan and effort of truly evil people, who understand the weaknesses of a democracy, especially one that is dominated (for now) by Protestant ethics. They seek to exploit this weakness, because they equate kindness and obligation to others as a weakness. It is something they would never do.
Look at Mexico. The condition of the Peons (for the most part, the Mestizos) is the result of the hate and contempt of the decadent, lurid Spaniard Conquistador culture. By acquiescing to their carefully nurtured invasion, helped along by paid fifth columnists in this country, we advance the cause of evil. In what way is this Christian? The war should be against them, because they are evil, and deserve deprivation and death. If they must face those they oppress every day, and we help the oppressed to end said oppression, then that is real Christian behavior.
And did not God Himself warn Nebuchadnezzar against the instability of multiculturalism through a dream?
well stated BUMP