Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay book ban goal of (Alabama) state lawmaker
Birmingham News ^ | 12/1/04 | KIM CHANDLER

Posted on 12/01/2004 3:48:43 PM PST by pete anderson

MONTGOMERY - An Alabama lawmaker who sought to ban gay marriages now wants to ban novels with gay characters from public libraries, including university libraries.

A bill by Rep. Gerald Allen, R-Cottondale, would prohibit the use of public funds for "the purchase of textbooks or library materials that recognize or promote homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle." Allen said he filed the bill to protect children from the "homosexual agenda."

"Our culture, how we know it today, is under attack from every angle," Allen said in a press conference Tuesday.

Allen said that if his bill passes, novels with gay protagonists and college textbooks that suggest homosexuality is natural would have to be removed from library shelves and destroyed.

"I guess we dig a big hole and dump them in and bury them," he said.

A spokesman for the Montgomery-based Southern Poverty Law Center called the bill censorship.

"It sounds like Nazi book burning to me," said SPLC spokesman Mark Potok.

Allen pre-filed his bill in advance of the 2005 legislative session, which begins Feb. 1.

If the bill became law, public school textbooks could not present homosexuality as a genetic trait and public libraries couldn't offer books with gay or bisexual characters.

When asked about Tennessee Williams' southern classic "Cat On A Hot Tin Roof," Allen said the play probably couldn't be performed by university theater groups.

Allen said no state funds should be used to pay for materials that foster homosexuality. He said that would include nonfiction books that suggest homosexuality is acceptable and fiction novels with gay characters. While that would ban books like "Heather has Two Mommies," it could also include classic and popular novels with gay characters such as "The Color Purple," "The Picture of Dorian Gray" and "Brideshead Revisted."

The bill also would ban materials that recognize or promote a lifestyle or actions prohibited by the sodomy and sexual misconduct laws of Alabama. Allen said that meant books with heterosexual couples committing those acts likely would be banned, too.

His bill also would prohibit a teacher from handing out materials or bringing in a classroom speaker who suggested homosexuality was OK, he said.

Allen has sponsored legislation to make a gay marriage ban part of the Alabama Constitution, but it was not approved by the Legislature.

Ken Baker, a board member of Equality Alabama, a gay rights organization, said Allen was "attempting to become the George Wallace of homosexuality."

Aside from the moral debates, the bill could be problematic for library collections, said Jaunita Owes, director of the Montgomery City-County Library, which is a few blocks from the Alabama Capitol.

"Half the books in the library could end up being banned. It's all based on how one interprets the material," Owes said.

E-mail: kchandler@bhamnews.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-269 next last
To: pete anderson
If the bill became law, public school textbooks could not present homosexuality as a genetic trait

This part's fine -- the rest is fascist garbage.

61 posted on 12/01/2004 5:48:58 PM PST by Sloth (Al Franken is a racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

This is a very scary proposition. What's next? There are scenes of incest in the Bible. Would this be banned as well?


62 posted on 12/01/2004 5:49:57 PM PST by Stratman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Stratman

Good point. The Bible would be out.


64 posted on 12/01/2004 5:54:49 PM PST by Sloth (Al Franken is a racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

So encouraging more of this is a good idea?

HIV Found in More U.S. Gay, Bisexual Men
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20041201/ts_nm/aids_cases_dc_7

Reproductive parts are simply not made to be shoved into elimination organs.


65 posted on 12/01/2004 5:56:10 PM PST by FreedomPoster (hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stratman

Yes, this bill would ban he Bible.


66 posted on 12/01/2004 5:57:58 PM PST by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

Doh. Me stupid. Sorry.


67 posted on 12/01/2004 6:03:42 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Stratman

I recall something about a prostitute and a gay teacher... I'll have to ask my kid, I read it sometime in the early eighties.


68 posted on 12/01/2004 6:18:54 PM PST by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
I am sure the ACLU would Cheer when the State Rep. pulls the Bible off the Shelf and tosses it in fire or hole or wherever he chooses to put it.
69 posted on 12/01/2004 6:22:53 PM PST by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

I remember the hooker. She was a "great conversationalist".


70 posted on 12/01/2004 6:29:55 PM PST by Stratman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

No, I don't recall the Bible promoting Sodomy, etc.


71 posted on 12/01/2004 6:29:58 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 (Sic Semper Tyrannis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: xm177e2

All powers not specifically given to the Federal Government are reserved to the states. States have the right to protect it citizens from sodomite literature.
Again, this really is up to the citizens of the Sovereign state of Alabama.


73 posted on 12/01/2004 6:34:24 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 (Sic Semper Tyrannis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Stratman
I don't remember any homosexuality in Catcher. Was there?
That one teacher trys to feel Holden Caufield up after he goes to stay at his place, I think.
74 posted on 12/01/2004 6:36:24 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

Here's some legal fun:

1) There's a gay character in a novel that's the protagonist, but he's portrayed as evil.

2) There's a gay character in a novel, and he's the protagonist, but he's portrayed as a complex character with some bad points and some good points.

3) There's a character in a novel that is devoid of sexual acts, the character is never actually called gay or homosexual, but the character is described as speaking with a lisp, dressing neatly with great skin, enjoying techno music, driving a Miata, who dances well, is a big fan of Bette Midler, and likes to vacation at Fire Island.

So which of these books get pulled from the library? And how much time do Alabama Courts spend deliberating this?


75 posted on 12/01/2004 6:39:37 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I wouldn't like it, but that is THEIR RIGHT.


76 posted on 12/01/2004 6:40:09 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 (Sic Semper Tyrannis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

Show me WHERE it says that.


77 posted on 12/01/2004 6:44:00 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 (Sic Semper Tyrannis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
Allen said that meant books with heterosexual couples committing those acts likely would be banned, too.

However, there are heterosexual indiscretions in Bible and would violate Rep. Allen's standard.

78 posted on 12/01/2004 6:47:56 PM PST by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
All powers not specifically given to the Federal Government are reserved to the states. States have the right to protect it citizens from sodomite literature. Again, this really is up to the citizens of the Sovereign state of Alabama.

Nice argument for 1861; ridiculous in 2004. If Alabama or any other state was fascist enough to pass this, which they aren't, the Federal Courts would block enforcement of the law until SCOTUS shot it down 9-0.

79 posted on 12/01/2004 7:10:37 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (31 Red States - All Your Senate Are Belong To Us!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Ophiucus
"Also, using your reasoning - all Bibles and books mentioning the Bible, Christianity, and containing Christian characters would have to be removed and destroyed."

What "reasoning" did I use, by the way?

I merely asked this question: How does a ban on public funds get twisted into a ban of something?

80 posted on 12/01/2004 7:14:33 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson