Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California measure requiring business to pay bulk of workers' health insurance narrowly defeated
AP ^ | 12/1/4

Posted on 12/01/2004 12:50:52 PM PST by SmithL

SACRAMENTO -- A ballot measure that would have required some employers to pay the bulk of workers' health insurance was narrowly defeated, election officials said Wednesday after the final results were tallied.

Proposition 72, which was opposed by business leaders and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, failed 50.9 percent to 49.1 percent, the secretary of state's office reported. The measure was defeated by a margin of 202,854 votes.

Counties had until Tuesday to count absentee and provisional ballots and turn in the results to state election officials.

The measure would have fundamentally reworked California's health care system by requiring some businesses to provide workers with insurance.

Employers with at least 50 workers would have paid at least 80 percent of the cost of health insurance for employees who put in more than 100 hours a month.

Businesses would have had to provide health insurance privately or pay into a state-run fund that would have purchased it for workers.

Only a handful of other states require employers to provide such insurance. For that reason, health care advocates and politicians around the nation closely watched the vote on Proposition 72.

The measure was supported by labor unions and medical organizations.

The governor called Proposition 72 a burden on business

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: prop72

1 posted on 12/01/2004 12:50:52 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
They tried to steal this one at the last minute.
2 posted on 12/01/2004 12:52:37 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Wow, that was close. That would have put a lot of small businesses out of business.


3 posted on 12/01/2004 12:52:54 PM PST by Santana (Proud aunt of niece serving in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

There was a report this morning that this measure was ahead. I guess someone screwed up.


4 posted on 12/01/2004 12:52:59 PM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
All right, everyone, EXHALE. California is still just a 'bad' place to do business, not a 'don't even try' place. We'll fix this state eventually. Maybe...
5 posted on 12/01/2004 12:57:38 PM PST by Dimez Apart (Charlie 2-19 WolfPack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
They didn't. San Diego County reported votes incorrectly. If you understood the high level of incompetence here in San Diego, you'd realize there was no malice here, only stupidity.
6 posted on 12/01/2004 12:58:25 PM PST by newzjunkey ("The rule of law has become confused with - indeed subverted by - the rule of judges." - Robert Bork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal
See my reply at #6
7 posted on 12/01/2004 12:59:21 PM PST by newzjunkey ("The rule of law has become confused with - indeed subverted by - the rule of judges." - Robert Bork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
i order things from newegg now and then. they were in California up until a few weeks ago. now they are shipping out of NJ which adds to shipping time and cost. i wonder if the moved and if this was a reason??
8 posted on 12/01/2004 12:59:39 PM PST by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santana
Wow, that was close. That would have put a lot of small businesses out of business.

It would have, or it would have put people out of work. If I had a company that had 60 - 70 employees, I would try very hard to make cuts and efficiency improvememnts to keep my head count at 49. A company with, say, 2-- or 250 folks on payroll would probably have to lay off 10 or 15% of their staff to pay the benefit for those that remain, or raise prices and get the money to pay for it from your customers, which puts you in cometitive disadvantage with a smaller, or out-of-state company. Any way you look at it, it ain't pretty.

9 posted on 12/01/2004 1:36:34 PM PST by GaltMeister (The only time a Democrat should be allowed in the White House is to visit the President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Santana

They'll try again and again until they get it - the libs NEVER give up :-(


10 posted on 12/01/2004 1:47:18 PM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Santana

They'll try again and again until they get it - the libs NEVER give up :-(


11 posted on 12/01/2004 1:47:32 PM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Santana
"That would have put a lot of small businesses out of business."

And probably cost a lot of other jobs, too, as businesses right around the 50-employee cutoff would have laid off a few employees or eliminated new hires to avoid the health insurance requirement.
12 posted on 12/01/2004 2:50:19 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Not to worry, it'll be back. No bad idea is ever dropped for long in California. The legislature is a perpetual motion machine of bad lawmaking.


13 posted on 12/01/2004 2:57:14 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

Yeah cause due to gerrymandering, the most extreme Lefties get returned to office time and time again. They never have to pay the price for - no they actually get rewarded by the voters for failure. Classic Liberalism 101.


14 posted on 12/01/2004 4:32:36 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Companies are going to be scared to offer worker benefits for fear the government will begin to force them to continue to do so.


15 posted on 12/01/2004 4:35:07 PM PST by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson