Posted on 12/01/2004 1:04:29 AM PST by eakole
"Yossef Bodansky, the former director of the U.S. Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and a man I respect immensely for his intelligence insights, says the United States faces an "inevitable" al-Qaida attack with weapons of mass destruction.
"What would be the U.S. response to such an attack?
"Now is the time to think about the unthinkable.
"Contingency plans need to be made. And those plans, at least some of them, need to be known to the whole world to serve as a deterrent against such an attack. "
"
* The Islamist world and its allies need to know there will be an unprecedented nuclear response to any attack on the United States with weapons of mass destruction. We don't need to be specific about which major cities and installations will be vaporized. But it needs to be clear that the response will be overwhelming, resulting in far greater death and destruction than what is inflicted upon the United States. We need to let the terrorists know that addresses of response have been determined. Those counseling the terrorists that such an attack on the United States is justified should be among the first to experience the horror."
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
+
=
MECCA NEEDS MUCH MORE than a neutron, imho.
DESTROY THE KABALA AND ALL THE INFRASTRUCTURE.
LET THEM KNOW THEIR DEMONIC MOON GOD COULDN'T DO PIG POOP WORTH OF PROTECTING THEM.
An easy response in a PC world would be high altitude, high throw-weight nuclear burts. The primary effect would be EMP -- electromagnetic pulse -- halting the function of virtually all 20th and 21st century devices. Do it at night so the visible and psyops impact would be extraordinary.
The 'receiving' locations would be knocked back to the 1600s in terms of technology for a long time. Follow it up with a "sucks being you" message via leaflets.
No Al Jezeera tapes/broadcast, no Toyota SUVs to run around in, no ability to conduct banking or pump water, no loudspeakers on the mosques, and no functioning satellite phones, cameras or laptops for the foreign 'journalists' to report with. And no ability to manufacture modern weapons either -- factories wont run.
Follow up is easy. Just lob a couple more as needed to remove any modern convenience that pops up.
You get the added value of destroying the geostationary satellites that provide comms to the region as well, not that anything would be functioning to receive a signal anyway.
After a day or so the atmosphere would calm down, and our satellites could resume monitoring the affected region for ANY sign of electronic activity, because now the signal-to-noise ration would be MUCH better. The surviving emitters MUST have been hardened, so now they are are point targets. We get to play pin the JADAM on the donkey.
EMP -- IT's an amazing indirect fire weapon with long-lasting effects on 'civilization' ;-)
SADLY,
Your reasoning is great survival reasoning and the only messages they seem to comprehend.
Not sure I like the parts of me that like your reasoning . . . but it's at least rational given all the givens.
Your suggestion has the side benefit of being quite puckish, but it misses the point.
Arabs understand one thing: force or the threat to use it. Threatening them with deactivation of their PS2 sets just won't do it.
I strongly suspect that private warnings were given to the Arabs in 2001 concerning what would happen to them should their wayward sons cross the Rubicon of WMD. As Iran closes in on a nuclear capability, it is now time to establish an Eisenhower-like doctrine of Massive Retaliation, involving every element of our nuclear triad.
The Islamic Fascists will understand that, right down to the last shahid. Right now, our policy is too publicly ambiguous.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
We are on our own. And if it is they who takes the hit, I pray we don't lift a single damned finger to help them. For their cowardice and abhorrence to the truth, they deserve whatever they get.
Chris -- I believe, kindly, that you miss MY point. It's not about de-activating PS-2 sets. IT's about reducing the Arab world to a 18th century technology status.
No banks, no money. no phones. no mechanized transportation. no utilities. no centralized communications. no product and service distribution capability. no manufacturing capabilities. ... and no ability to generate cash from oil reserves. and on and on an on. They would be removed as a threat for years to come and rendered helpless and impotent. Thier governments would collapse. With no money and no digital loudspeakers, they would be what they were in the 1700s.
Think through the scenario. In an Armageddon-like, 1000-sun instant, the night sky is lit up for perhaps 30 seconds, and then nothing works. nothing. No information flows except rumors. No lights but lamps function, nor radios receive or transmit anything. And this goes on 'forever'. I think that would have more real impact than "threatening them with deactivation of their PS2 sets ..." Don't patronize me Chris. I know better, and so do you.
There's more to this scenario than I have posted, but do not belittle its efficacy.
MAD worked in the Cold War because even the commies didn't want to die and have their families/countries destroyed.
The suicidial mentality of the Islamofascists/Kazis prevents MAD from working with them.
I think that Travis has posted about taking out their holy centers/places. That should be a plan not an option. Condi Rice next year needs to let each Middle East Ruler know that. Let them know that if an WMD attack happens in America, that we will automatically launch WMDS to take out every key religious center/place. Then if any country is found connected to the WMDs, it will be destroyed.
The other realtime option is to start taking out the top Islamofascists where ever they live and those who finance terrorism.
If Abdul will pray, to a glowing crater.
When polled, Arabs regularly agree with this proposition: It would be a good thing if there was a nuclear exchange where 50 million Arabs died, but Israel was destroyed forever.
So forget about threatening cities to deter fanatical jihadists.
They only care about one thing: the black moon-god ka'aba rock in Mecca.
Devout Muslims believe that Allah would stop infidel missiles in space from damaging the black moon-god rock.
BUT, if the moon rock WAS craterized, this would constitute final proof to them that their Allah was NOT greater (Allahu Akbar means "our God is greater.)
The craterizing of Mecca would mean the end of Islam in a short period of time.
63 works for me.
How then would the West extract the ME oil required to function at our own 21st century level?
Go in post-strike to reconstitute the system, with occupational troops and contract oil workers?
A disruption of ME oil flows even for a matter of weeks or months would destroy the Western economies.
What about the guided missile and anthrax coordinated attack that went down on September 11?
Was that not a WMD attack?
Life is a sexually-transmitted fatal disease.
Look, if you don't threaten to kill people, Johnnie Jihad won't care what you threaten to do. They don't understand civilizational throwback. I understand where you are going with this, but it won't deter anybody. I was not trying to be patronizing, just pointing out the obvious.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
We should also spread the rumor that pig parts are included in every US nuclear weapon.
I think most people think about a WMD as a NUKE Blast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.