Who is going to die?

World Net Daily ^ | December 1, 2004 | Joseph Farah

[eakole]

"Yossef Bodansky, the former director of the U.S. Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and a man I respect immensely for his intelligence insights, says the United States faces an "inevitable" al-Qaida attack with weapons of mass destruction.

"What would be the U.S. response to such an attack?

"Now is the time to think about the unthinkable.

"Contingency plans need to be made. And those plans, at least some of them, need to be known to the whole world to serve as a deterrent against such an attack. …"

"… * The Islamist world and its allies need to know there will be an unprecedented nuclear response to any attack on the United States with weapons of mass destruction. We don't need to be specific about which major cities and installations will be vaporized. But it needs to be clear that the response will be overwhelming, resulting in far greater death and destruction than what is inflicted upon the United States. We need to let the terrorists know that addresses of response have been determined. Those counseling the terrorists that such an attack on the United States is justified should be among the first to experience the horror."

[Squantos]

Yep....waste of time IMHO......nuke em now nuke em now !....:o)

[BulletBobCo]

Nuke'em til they glow.....then nuke'em again.

[Squantos]

Make em stare at this for hours .......:o)

[Bon mots]

Therefore, our response will be nuclear and it will arriving in one of your cities within the next few hours.

Why only one?
Our response should be over the top, horrific, irresponsible, shockingly excessive and inexcusable. If you have to hit someone who has attacked you, hit them as hard, fast and repeatedly as you possibly can. Otherwise, go crying home to mama.

[tm22721]

All of our cities will look like Fallujah one month after the lights go out.

And that's bad ?

Many here are sitting on the edge of their seats waiting (praying) for it to happen.

BUMP