Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Happy2BMe

When you can use slave wages to compete against regular wages, the regular paying jobs lose.


5 posted on 11/29/2004 7:05:14 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy

"When you can use slave wages to compete against regular wages, the regular paying jobs lose."

You clearly have never been to Asia. A person can survive just fine on about US $300 per month; this allows them to lease a small flat, feed their family and exist. If one or two other members of the family also are working, they will save money to better their lives. This is the reason that people from Mexico and Central America sneak into the U.S. for the agricultural and manual labor in the U.S. during the Summer; the money they make (small by our standards) will allow their family to survive very well til the following Summer.


40 posted on 11/29/2004 7:58:33 PM PST by Chu Gary (USN Intel guy 1967 - 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: A CA Guy
When you can use slave wages to compete against regular wages, the regular paying jobs lose

In the particular case of cars, they already were in critical condition. Several weeks ago there was a post about GM's Opel operation in Germany that wanted to shut down some plants and consolidate, in an attempt to regain profitability.

German "worker rights" laws blocked the consolidation, claiming some workers would lose jobs. They mandated that Opel keep the existing operation going, virtually guaranteeing additional losses; protecting worker's "rights" to a job, regardless of the actual economic consequences to Opel

Slave wages or not, Opel was in critical condition, terminally ill, but the Germans were only interested in the worker. This simply made it far more difficult to "compete" with a lower cost producer.

While they may be "slave wages" to you, but I'd bet the Chinese workers don't agree. Government regulations and worker's rights universally raise prices, so any economy that doesn't "overburden" corporations will win in the long run.

We, of all people should have figured that out by now. Expecting corporate altruism is unrealistic, because self-sacrifice becomes suicide if fully implemented.

It takes some very special circumstances for one to be willing to die for the sake of others, and business relationships fail to meet that qualification.

The requirement for one to make (unilateral) sacrifices for others, is anti-freedom, and is a special form of slavery.

That requirement went out of vogue with the Aztecs (ultimate altruism), and later during the Civil War (coerced altruism)

56 posted on 11/30/2004 5:01:54 PM PST by Socrates1 (Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson