[Real Cynic No More]

It's about the liberals trying to sew discontent and create an uprising.

[noodler]

"sew" discontent? I always thought sowing discontent was something.They are perhaps really tying it together sew you're correct.

[nothingnew]

It's about the liberals trying to sew discontent and create an uprising.

I have updated my FMCDH (From My Cold Dead Hands) sign-off with the addition of (BITS).....Blood In The Streets, which I foresee coming soon, due to the enormous increase of the Marxist progressive movement being shoved down the throat of this failing REPUBLIC through the Judicial tyranny of fiat law, the passing of unconstitutional laws by the Legislative and Executive branches of our government and the enormous tax burden placed upon the average American to support unconstitutional programs put forth by Marxist ideology.

FMCDH(BITS)

[LibertyRocks]

"It's about the liberals trying to sew discontent and create an uprising."

I don't agree with your interpretation of what is happening here. The way I see it an open investigation of the alleged problems will PREVENT an uprising in the future. I say let them investigate. From what I understand this cost is not borne by the state or the taxpayers, but by those who initiate the recount as it's not due to the "close vote".

There are real problems with the way voting was conducted in some of these places. I have read accounts where they literally found ballots signed by precinct captains in the garbage can outside one Ohio counting facility.

If there are real cases of fraud, intimidation, computer problems, etc... then everything should be done to prevent it from happening in the future.

This is not about overturning the election. Bush won. This is about fixing problems in our election system. Problems that if left unchecked could end up benefitting the liberals you complain so much about - you don't want that right?

As Republicans keep saying, Bush won - so why are so many fighting these recounts and investigations? If the GAO and the League of Women's Voters has come out and said there should be investigations then there is obviously enough evidence of some type of wrongdoing or errors to warrant just concern.

Another point in relation to the elections and these recounts is the fact that if it were all done on paper we would not have any tampering charges appearing in connection with the computerized voting machines. I don't care how dang long it takes to count the votes. Paper ballots cannot be as easily manipulated as a computer database, or scanning apparatus (lint, smudges, etc...).

(BTW - in one precinct in Ohio almost half the votes for Kerry wound up in Badnarik's column due to a database malfunction. What if it were Bush's votes that wound up there instead?)