To: Happy2BMe
An Israeli General said to me a few weeks ago that he did not feel the Nuke Missiles that Iran were setting up were for Israel, but for use against Saudi Arabia. He said he felt that within two years the Saudi's would be run out of Mecca by hardliners.
I wonder if this story has more than meets the eye?
38 posted on
11/29/2004 6:02:32 AM PST by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: American in Israel; F14 Pilot
"He said he felt that within two years the Saudi's would be run out of Mecca by hardliners.""
_____________________________
That would the the Taliban and the followers of Ayotollah Khomeni.
Very reasonable. Very World War III-ish.
43 posted on
11/29/2004 6:18:16 AM PST by
Happy2BMe
(It's not quite time to rest - John Kerry is still out there (and so is Hillary))
To: American in Israel
An Israeli General said to me a few weeks ago that he did not feel the Nuke Missiles that Iran were setting up were for Israel, but for use against Saudi Arabia. Self-delusion is alive and well in the IDF. There are but 2 targets of an Iranian nuke; Tel Aviv and New York City.
He said he felt that within two years the Saudi's would be run out of Mecca by hardliners.
That wouldn't surprise me one bit.
57 posted on
11/29/2004 9:26:50 AM PST by
steveegg
(At this point, even Baghdad Bob has more credibility than Dan Blather)
To: American in Israel
He said he felt that within two years the Saudi's would be run out of Mecca by hardliners.
Don't forget one other variable in the mix -- the Hashemite dynasty were the traditional protectors of Makkah and Madinah until the Sauds kicked them out (with a little help from the Brits)
77 posted on
11/30/2004 2:23:01 AM PST by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson