Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro
Sadly, I am getting to trust the Washington Times less and less

Why? The source of the news story is not hidden, and it is accurately reported that IRAN is claiming that the Saudis have nukes.

Read between the lines, the Times isn't providing free ink to those thugs in Tehran, they are reporting a story which demonstrates the lengths to which the mad mullahs will go to try and divert attention away from their nuclear goals.

Make no mistake about this: IF Tehran acquires even one nuke, they will use it on Israel. You can take that to the bank.

Which is why Israel will pull an Osirak on Iran LONG before Tehran gets to the point where they can target Israel with such a weapon.

The U.S. ought to be doing everything possible to destablize the mullahs and their oppressive regime, and encouraging the Iranian people to overthrow their masters. It was because of the U.S. that the Assahollah Khomeini seized power in the first place after that incompetent, treasonous fool Jimmy Carter betrayed the Shah of Iran, who up until his ouster, was THE most solid ally we had in the region, outside of Israel itself.

We have an obligation to make things right for the Iranian people.
19 posted on 11/29/2004 12:11:46 AM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Mammoth

"It was because of the U.S. that the Assahollah Khomeini seized power in the first place after that incompetent, treasonous fool Jimmy Carter betrayed the Shah of Iran, who up until his ouster, was THE most solid ally we had in the region, outside of Israel itself."

Believe me, I'm no fan of Jimmy Carter, but what do you think he could have done - and if there was something to do, don't you think Reagan would have done it when he took over shortly thereafter?

Iran was ripe for a revolution - and now that they have the Ayatollahs in charge - they don't like it. I'm just curious what you think we should have done when they took over the Embassy -


27 posted on 11/29/2004 2:40:36 AM PST by M. Peach (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Mammoth
It is speculated that the Iranians have buried, hidden sites where the Nuke research activity is taking place.

If Israel is not satisfied that they know where the proper site is located for a surgical strike, I foresee a complete preemptive annihilation of Tehran and other key cities by Zion nukes if the Mullah saber rattling reaches a critical point.

The international outcry would threaten Israel's existence as a nation, but that what they were born to as a nation in 1949. The fear of war is nothing new to them.
34 posted on 11/29/2004 4:41:00 AM PST by Rebelbase (Who is General Chat and why does he/she have their own forum?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Mammoth
Make no mistake about this: IF Tehran acquires even one nuke, they will use it on Israel.

That's about the only thing that would turn American Joos into flaming conservatives.


BUMP

53 posted on 11/29/2004 8:28:28 AM PST by tm22721 (In fac they)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson